Was the footy coverage on Nine, Ten and Foxtel any good? Well, it could have been worse, it could have ALL been on Foxtel. And it could have been utterly hideous, it could have ALL been on Seven, like it once was. (Shudder.) Two articles from the Weekend Oz addressed our strange broadcasting arrangements and the anti-siphoning laws.
Sam Maiden:
Tougher tests for big-game TV rights
FREE-TO-AIR television stations face a tougher "use it or lose it" test for sports broadcasts under a push by Coalition MPs to stop hoarding by networks.
Matt Price:
Fox Footy's demise still hard to take
THE familiar October melancholy looms greyer than ever. Fremantle's improbably enthralling September run, followed by an electrifying, epic AFL grand final, makes this year's brutally instant footy fast even tougher to stomach. Compounded, cruelly, by the manslaughter of Fox Footy Channel.
We have anti-siphoning regulations to make sure nationally significant sporting events are kept on free-to-air television. Looking at the list, it seems there's plenty of room for flexibility, but it's fair to say there'd be one hell of a ruckus if, say, the AFL grand final, the NRL State of Origin or the Melbourne Cup suddenly found themselves on cable telly.
Nor is it likely governments of either stripe would abolish the present situation. The Liberal government instigated the regs and are looking at "use it or lose it" amendments. While Labor are firmly behind the status quo: "There are millions of Australian families who cannot afford pay-TV who rely on an effective anti-siphoning list" ~~ Senator Conroy. Abolition is in courageous decision territory, so we're pretty much stuck with things the way they are.
Every now and again I'm tempted to want all footy and cricket on Foxtel. Cricket here in summer would certainly benefit from a change away from Nine. But to be perfectly frank, while Nine and Ten have their faults with the footy, I can't see Foxtel doing it any better if they had all the rights. You need only look at ESPN to see why full cable coverage could be poison. They and Fox in the states have had to stump up so much moolah for the rights to the NFL that they need to have advertisements during all stoppages. Same with the Baseball. That's not the case here - so far. ESPN Straya have the gall to show all the ads during their replays. It's a flippin' disgrace. What compounds the pain is that we don't even get to see the American ads, some of which are pretty damn fine, we just get Tommy Smyth with a Woy relentlessly inciting us to "put it in the old onion bag" and plugs for rubbish like the Strayan version of Pardon the Interruption. Ads on subscription television are just wrong, wrong, wrong.
To be perfectly frank, I'm pretty, generally, roughly happy to have my footy spread across free to air and subscription telly. Although that may change given my pathalogical hatred of Channel Seven.
By the way, can anyone make sense of this Matt Price paragraph? The manslaughter of Fox Footy is ALL the federal government's fault, except the bits that aren't.
It's tempting to blame the AFL for diving into the oceans of cash before locking in national coverage. Tempting, but misguided; all blame resides with the federal Government. It's illegal for the AFL politburo to deal directly with pay TV since all games must first be offered to free-to-air networks. Andrew Demetriou is a mighty powerful chief comrade, but the AFL boss held no sway here since under an old, misguided deal Seven held last bid rights to match or trump the Nine/Fox offer.
Comments
m0nty
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Big Ramifications
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Tony Tea
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Tony Tea
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Professor Rosseforp
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Tony Tea
ALLPARK FIGURE (6)
Tony Tea
CUT A SHORT STORY LONG (3)
Tony Tea
CUT A SHORT STORY LONG (3)
Professor Rosseforp
CUT A SHORT STORY LONG (3)
Tony Tea