John Inverarity:
"I don't think it's in the interests of the player to reveal every little niggle. Players don't want to be seen as vulnerable or physically suspect and we respect that. We won't always say that he's got a bit of a bad knee because more can be made of it and it's awkward for the player."
"AFL footballers have a four or five month period in which they have a carefully programmed conditioning period. Now the cricketers at the moment, it's very difficult to find a timeslot, an extended timeslot, when they can undergo appropriate conditioning."
Andrew Faulkner:
However, AFL clubs also readily produce, and update almost daily, a full list of injuries.
Indeed they do. And no one believes the AFL clubs. "Four-to-six weeks" has been reduced to the status of a punch line. "General soreness" is now followed by a "boom tish".
How many times have you heard a footballer veer off-message into the wilds of unpalatable truth? One? two? Three-hundred? Then comes the stacks-on shellacking punctuated by the odd "Well, to be perfectly honest it is rather refreshing to have a footballer speak his mind" before they get back to the core business of shellacking the player.
No doubt the very first Power Point slide in public relations reads: "Tell the truth to the media and all you do is prove to yourself that you should not tell the truth to the media." (If it's not, I only charge by the word, including discounts for pronouns.)
John Inverarity strikes me as a person whose first port of call is The Truth. Not for him the bland platitudes of his predecessor coupled with his legalistic caution. How long will John Inverarity be John Inverarity? The nexus between in-private decision making and in-public communication is wide and fraught with hair-triggered gotchas.
The recent conflicting communications and terminology over injuries and rotation to Siddle and Starc are testament to the media's ability to point out / highlight / dramatise (take your pick) a muddled message. "You said rotation, then said injury, what is it? Your methods are obviously madness."
When Invers has to resort to sport speak, "informed player management" for instance, he appears unconvinced by the jargon. He sounds like a 50 year old bloke trying to, like, get down with the youngsters.
If he wants to go with "rotation" stick with "rotation". He should not let the media push him into finagling his message.
There are too many fatheads who don't understand, refuse to understand, or have been back-grounded by a vested interest or an old player (who could be both) to tailor individual messages. You're not going to please everyone; especially if they are click-baiting the oaf demographic:
Baggy greens are earned, not available on rotation
ROTATION and resting have become the dirty words in Australian cricket where the country's top fast bowlers literally don't know whether they are coming or going.
Former spearhead Brett Lee is a strident critic of the rest and rotations.
I wish Lee had been rested from the Melbourne Test against South Africa in 2008 when he played carrying an injury and his foot fell apart.