Forget Australia's pathetic cricket in the first two Tests, the subsequent selectors' scythe and any prospects for the Third Test, the following article is 100% rolled-gold LOOK OVER THERE! I love it. Ben Horne, you win this week's internet:
South Africa captain Faf du Plessis hit with fine but free to face Aussies in Adelaide
The smug South African captain
smashed with a fine
Du Plessis... with his reputation now in tatters
the sooky Proteas
South Africa are filthy with the result
Du Plessis was already a self-confessed ball tamperer
ICC bizarrely treated lollygate as a first offence
damning television footage
tried to turn the hearing into a forensic case and force the ICC to prove that the practice actually made a tangible difference to the ball swinging
ICC skewered du Plessis based on his flagrant abuse of the spirit of cricket
umpires had no hesitation in branding du Plessis guilty
du Plessis looked ashen faced
South Africa’s arrogant and self-righteous attitude
The Proteas argument was not that du Plessis was innocent but that everybody else does it, so why should they be targeted?
“you see it daily with those type of incidences taking place on the field.”
South Africa’s only argument appears to be that everybody else in world cricket uses the tactics employed by du Plessis
So, basically, mints don't work but everyone does it. Flaws, much?
Posted by: Tony Tea | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 09:24 AM
Barry Richards: “My bat edges were 18 millimetres and David Warner’s is 60 and no one says a word." #LookOverThere #SookySouthAfricans
Posted by: Tony Tea | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 09:28 AM
Actually, one question about the Third Test: Will the sooky South Africans be arrogant and self-righteous enough to tamper with the ball in Adelaide?
Posted by: Tony Tea | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 09:36 AM
South Africa's 20 year absence from cricket meant they missed the classes in which you learn how to invent convincing excuses.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 09:40 AM
Read this, you c***s.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:15 AM
Good chance for a smart lolly maker to sponsor the non existent everyone does it ball ampering. "This inswinger bought to you by Mentos"
Posted by: Philsgone | Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 11:15 AM
This was a joke against Du Plessis. the Umpires are required to inspect the ball every so often. They do it after every wicket and they did not do a thing . In other words they saw nothing wrong with the ball.
how can the man be gulity then unless the Umpires were incompetent
Posted by: I am and will always be Not Trampis | Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 10:28 AM
TV is king, Homer. The umpires had no hesitation in branding du Plessis guilty... when they saw the footage.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 10:48 AM
The footage does not matter. What matters is the condition of the ball and they must have said it was okay. If not they could have awarded 5 penalty runs to Australia and asked for another ball.
They did not. ipsofacto the ball was not tampered with!
Posted by: I am and will always be Not Trampis | Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 11:19 AM
Potential test of the day/night format coming up. We saw last year that a lot of wickets fell under lights here. If we knock South Africa over in the next hour or so, there's the possibility of a very tricky half session or so against the new ball under lights.
Posted by: Carrot | Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 06:32 PM
None for at stumps. 3 off 39 and 8 off 34. Where have you been, my precious ones?
Posted by: Tony Tea | Thursday, November 24, 2016 at 10:14 PM
TT, that article is very funny.
Posted by: lou | Friday, November 25, 2016 at 06:24 AM
Sensational strategy by Smith, Warner ans Boof. Why is the youg SA bnowler the onlt SA bowler able to swing the ball?
Posted by: I am and will always be Not Trampis | Friday, November 25, 2016 at 08:31 AM
I am with Keith Miller who thought a decent batsman in Australia should be able to play a finger spinner here with a toothpick!
Is there any wrist spinner on the horizon?
Having sad that Ali should bowl better in Australia as he uses flight a lot more. That doesn't mean he should take wickets though.
Posted by: I am and will always be Not Trampis | Friday, November 25, 2016 at 08:39 AM
I like Faf's work. Bstted very well, then shows he is a cloever bastard as well. Lot to like about him.
Posted by: Philsgone | Friday, November 25, 2016 at 10:00 AM
I agree with Chappelli. Faff should be captain even when AB comes back.
one hell of a test side!
Posted by: I am and will always be Not Trampis | Friday, November 25, 2016 at 10:40 AM
Well if yesterday is the blueprint for the future. then we have a lot to look forward to,
Posted by: Philsgone | Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 09:01 AM
Bat all day to make a hundred.
Oh how I love Usman right now.
Posted by: Bruce | Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 10:05 AM
Brilliant opening bowling session on the first day by the Pink Ball. This is ball-tampering legitimised. When I saw Nathan Lyon get a massive swing going (not swing generated by spin on the ball, but paceman's swing, I know that lollygate was just all confection.
By the way, congrats to Faff for showing the benefits of sugar after Peter Fitzsimons had given it such a terrible serve in the media on the weekend (no doubt in time for the Christmas market and his new book).
Questions still linger, though.
Do the sugar-free mints have the same sweet spot that sugary lollies do? Do diabetics now have a reduced career expectancy in cricket?
Posted by: Professor Rosseforp | Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 05:37 PM
Come on, Stephen Cook! There's always something about a player with a slightly dodgy technique, particularly when they cop a pasting from the commentators - Kevin Pietersen, I'm looking at you.
Posted by: Carrot | Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 09:28 PM
If only the selectors had picked that side for the first test. Apart from Maddinson of course, who is not fit for beach cricket.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 01, 2016 at 01:59 PM