Shane Warne, Marlon Samuels and Cameron White face charges over fiery Big Bash clash
Warne has been charged with four alleged breaches:
* Rule 2.1: Show serious dissent at an umpire's decision
* Rule 2.2: Engage in inappropriate and deliberate physical contact with other players or officials
* Rule 2.5: Throw the ball at or near a player or official in an inappropriate and/or dangerous manner
* Rule 2.6: Use language that is obscene, offensive or of a generally insulting nature to another player, official or spectator
Samuels has been charged with two alleged breaches:
* Rule 2.2: Engage in inappropriate and deliberate physical contact with other players or officials
* Rule 6: Unbecoming Behaviour, namely that "players and officials must not at any time engage in behaviour unbecoming to a representative player or official that could (a) bring them or the game of cricket into disrepute or (b) be harmful to the interests of cricket.
Cameron White has been charged with one alleged breach:
* Rule 1.2: Show dissent at an umpire's decision
You cynics are off the mark. The key entertainment is yet to happen. The laughable justifications for their actions, the risible excuses, the too-light punishments, one or two suspended sentence chuckles, an ironic smirk at how Marlon was pinged for throwing his bat (underarm, mind you) but not pinged for throwing the ball, the odd "just blowing off steam in the heat of battle" from rent-a-quote ex-players moved to opine, Mike and the McKennas' laugh-laden press releases, the professional apologies, and a stray "taken out of context".
On a purely technical nature, I notice that Cameron White has been charged with "Rule 1.2: Show dissent at an umpire's decision" whereas Shane Warne has been charged with "Rule 2.1: Show serious dissent at an umpire's decision." Curious that "serious" warrants its own rule. While Samuels has been charged with "Rule 6: unbecoming behaviour" but White and Warne have not been charged with unbecoming behaviour.
As Hollywood said to the Bowlologist on mic the next over: "Just trying to make something happen."
It was a carnival sideshow from start to finish.
Posted by: m0nty | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 11:53 AM
I didn't see what White did, but I assume it was the sort of disagreement about an umpire's decision that you occasionally see. Warne on the other hand launched into a tirade at the umpire after a McKay bouncer was called a wide. During his international career, I always thought Warne deserved a punishment for dissent, but last night was far more blatant and angry than anything I'd seen before, and definitely worthy of being punished at a higher level than regular dissent.
I don't know exactly what the code of conduct is for the Big Bash. The ICC one doesn't have the word "unbecoming" in it; perhaps there's a rule for throwing a ball at someone but no rule for throwing a bat.
From the article: "The Melbourne Stars are currently considering an appeal [against Warne's one-match suspension]."
Ha! That would be a very optimistic appeal.
Posted by: David Barry | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 12:02 PM
m0nty, I don't think downplaying the incident after the fact is particularly good evidence that they didn't mean it at the time. Samuels rubs opposition players up the wrong way, and there was plenty of angst on display.
Obviously I'm part of the rabble in the outer that so got up the noses of Lord Harris and Jardine, but I quite enjoyed last night's match. Big crowd, plenty of angst, good batting, some shit-house fielding and the right result (sort-of, a Stars win might have locked in 3 Melbourne finals, but alas).
Posted by: Russ | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 12:10 PM
I hate the way they do that. I link to one article, then they update that article with what is basically a new article.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 12:22 PM
I hope they appeal and Mike Proctor is the judge. Then it would get overturned and we can all go sit in a bus. Farce.
$4500 is a cheap hand of poker for Warne, and a one match suspension is less than he imposed on himself to go back to England for Christmas with Liz.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 01:05 PM
I only saw the last part of last night's second innings, and it was a yawn.
Posted by: m0nty | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 01:36 PM
Warne v Samuels Scamerabilia available?
Wouldn't think Nein would miss that opportunity!
Posted by: @TKYC | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 01:51 PM
A limited edition authentic replica of Marlon Samuel's bat: WOOD CHUCK! $500 Unframed.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 02:09 PM
The last part of a not terribly close game usually is, regardless of sport or format.
Posted by: Russ | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 02:37 PM
I thought Tawny might come back by seance and sell something
Posted by: The Don has risen | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 03:04 PM
The farce of sportsmen considering their options for appeal just after they get whacked and then deciding to accept the sanction as if they had any damn say in the matter makes me roll my eyes.
Posted by: Bruce | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 09:29 PM
Warnie was "standing up for" his teammate.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Monday, January 07, 2013 at 10:24 PM
I just realised Warnie did not get found guilty for chucking the ball at Hurlem. Admittedly he only lobbed a softie and I have not seen the footage more than twice, but surely he lobbed the ball at Hurley.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 09:49 AM
Warne did throw the ball at Samuels, there's no doubting that.
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 10:35 AM
I don't know what was tendered for the defence, but I reckon it's London to a brick Warne bullshitted that he was just throwing the ball back to the keeper and accidentally clocked Hurlem. Be interesting to see who Hurlem says he was throwing his bat to.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:05 AM
Warne was out of control. Here's the video of the confrontations: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5KkL-LUwH0
Warne has deliberately thrown the ball at, and hit, Samuels.
Samuels has not thrown the bat at, nor did he hit, Warne.
The earlier shirt tug from Samuels on Hussey was no where near as aggressive as Warne on Samuels. Samuels should be punished for what he did to Hussey, but Warne's actions seemed premeditated, deliberately designed to provoke a confrontation.
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:14 AM
I take the bat throw from Samuels as throwing the bat away in disgust. If he wanted to hit Warne he should have thrown it side arm to his left at Warne. As it is, he threw it underarm, down the pitch, in the air, at no one, and hit no one.
If you want to hit someone with a bat this is how you do it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8edVt6trTg
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:17 AM
This is throwing the bat away in disgust: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1oiYV73lYhg
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:21 AM
"Warne's actions seemed premeditated, deliberately designed to provoke a confrontation."
There was most definitely a touch of the McEnroes about his shenanigans.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:22 AM
More bat throwing.
No doubt about DK - deprive him of a retail dollar and he really cracks the shits.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Lillee's always had a touch of the tosser about him.
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:31 AM
Correct appellation: Dennis Keith Carpet Call Steel Blue Williams Pale Ale Lillee.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 11:50 AM
Centrum and Solar Gain too. Just be thankful for no Advanced Hair.
Posted by: Hangover Black | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 01:43 PM
Lack of fake hair - respect.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 01:56 PM
Slogger Slatts looks well placed to overhaul DK in the spruiker stakes.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 01:56 PM
Jeez, I hope that sports jacket/board shorts combo will be a one-off. Ridiculous doesn't begin to describe it.
Posted by: Hangover Black | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 02:18 PM
Mr Hangover, You ever seen the business jacket / matching skirt combo that a few Polynesian Prime Ministers have worn at CHOGM type gab fests? Keepin' it real, yo.
I smelt a giant WWF rat when I heard about this BBL fight yesterday. Staged. Can't even be bothered clicking the links kindly provided by Patard, don't even care if I'm wrong. I saw a few pics of the shiny ceramic-faced idiot in the newspaper this morning, yelling at the [whatever adjective I use will be considered racist – so insert your own here] West Indian.
Even if it is legit, it's a nothing cricket match. Like watching a blue at a C grade mixed touch rugby game.
Posted by: Big Ramifications | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 02:51 PM
The only thing that springs to mind from the CHOGM stuff are the horrible shirts.
I think Warne is just past the point of being able to influence matches with his cricket ability and instead tried using bluff and bluster. His frustration at knowing that's all he has left probably led to the over-reaction.
Would've loved to have seen a camera on Warne when Samuels had his eye socket broken. Reckon he would've been grinning.
Posted by: Hangover Black | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 03:18 PM
I must admit the thought of it being staged did cross my mind, but the only staging I reckon was by Warney deliberately winding things up.
He's an Alpha Dawg in the stylings the manosphere Yanks blogs revere. I hereby posit, a) he genuinely was pissed off about the Hussey thing, b) at all times wants to impose himself on a match and c) has a bent for the theatrical.
Adjudication: real, though somewhat amplified by a natural instigator.
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 03:22 PM
Would've loved to have seen a camera on Warne when Samuels had his eye socket broken.
I noted that no one went running to his assistance.
Posted by: M. Patard | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 03:23 PM
I used to have a skipper, who when the opposition skipped copped a bouncer on the bugle, sneered "get off the ground, suck."
Posted by: Tony Tea | Tuesday, January 08, 2013 at 05:33 PM
Turned Aunty on at 5 mins to 10, heard 20/20, turned off. I'll catch the 11 o'clock news then thanks.
For all its intent to be about EXCITEMENT!!! and THRILLS!!! I just can't fucking stand the BBL. 20/20 between international sides as a tour opener or whatever are ok but this dumbed down cash grab of something that's meant to resemble cricket just rubs me the wrong way.
Posted by: Vindicate | Wednesday, January 09, 2013 at 07:30 AM
I concur
Posted by: The Don has risen | Wednesday, January 09, 2013 at 02:42 PM
"yelling at the [whatever adjective I use will be considered racist – so insert your own here] West Indian."
~
~
Jesus. What a complete tosser I am, eh? I request a right of reply to myself to try and salvage my reputation.
I called Warnie a fair few colourful names in my post, just for lulz. Love the guy. Love how he's getting a bit of a Gary Ablett Sr / Claus von Bülow aura about him these last couple of years.
I had a few
wittyshouty words figured out for Samuels, naturally. But coz he's black.... I started to fret that the words kinda didn't sit right. I felt a disturbance in the force.Someone might nitpick the jibes.... and the thread might get all political and non-crickety.... so I went the self censorship route.
I was kind of BUTT HURT about having to do that, and I was sort of having an out-loud argument with my brane when I wrote that bit.
Posted by: Big Ramifications | Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 09:35 AM
Tosser? You mean dickhead.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 09:45 AM
Who was that masked man?
Posted by: M. Patard | Thursday, January 10, 2013 at 02:03 PM