Wednesday's T20 at the West Sydney Wastelands had rock all going for it, and would have had even less than rock all going for it if it was not for Cow Corner Warner's switch hit, which re-started the debate over the shot's legality:
Dave Warner's blow ignites debate between left and right
DAVE Warner's sensational 100m switch hit for six in Wednesday's Twenty20 match has reignited debate over the legality of the shot.
Dave Hussey loved it, I think:
Teammate David Hussey - a batsman - is a fan of the shot.
But Hussey admitted he got frustrated with Warner when bowling to him at training. "Dave does it to me in the nets all the time. It frustrated me, so I beamed him - I tried to hit him in the head. It didn't go down very well, so we had a bit of a falling out for a couple of moments."
"No, no, no. You hit him on the head. You naughty moose."
I doubt I'm alone in my view, but we do have a couple of rules where the difference between on and off side are important. LBW, the zone for wides and the number of men behind square on the leg side.
Once the batsman switches then those definitions get redefined to whatever benefits the fielding side the most.
Posted by: Bruce | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 11:44 AM
Speaking of switch hitting.
When I was a kid, me and my brother would play Shield matches in the back yard, which entailed us batting through the whole line-up of whichever sides we had playing.
When a left hander was called up, we also had to bat left handed.
The thing is, I got pretty good batting the other way around, and in fact I was more correct batting left handed, probably because my dominant right hand was now my top hand.
But I had much less power batting left handed, which makes Cow Corner's monster hoik all the more amazing. Then again, I had a Grey Nick size six, not a rocket fuelled, turbocharged super clubber.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 11:48 AM
Bruce, yes I agree with that. Switch hitting is fine as long as the rules... sorry, Laws are updated to reflect the new shot.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 11:52 AM
Is Warner actually a natural left-hander? For some reason I was thinking he wasn't - that that is his natural slogging side. CI lists him as a leg-break bowler, but that is a bit vague. Has arms like Sammy Stosur though, so either hand is going to go a long way.
Posted by: Russ | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 12:15 PM
Good point. He's a right hand bowler, is he not? That could well mean he's a natural righty with all the natural strength that entails.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 12:23 PM
Have no issue with the switch hit incidentally. The lbw law becomes generous on both sides, so don't know why bowlers don't just aim wide on what was the off-side. Field is set for it, batsman needs to use feet (unlikely after switching), decent chance of a stumping if you fire it in. Ashwin basically plopped it in the slot. Not optimal.
Posted by: Russ | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 12:37 PM
I like switch hitting coz switch hitter is slang for a bisexual man.
Heh heh. Dave Warner is a switch hitter.
I'm laughing already.
Posted by: Big Ramifications | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 01:02 PM
Chuckle, choke, chicken.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 01:15 PM
A bowler is not allowed to change arms when bowling yet a batsman can his.
cricket has always been , will always be a batsman's game
Posted by: The Don has Risen | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 01:47 PM
Rock all going for it?
Haddin's imminent demise is far from rock all. And lest I be chastised for wishing ill upon an Australian player, this is my response:
http://www.espncricinfo.com/south-africa-v-australia-2011/engine/match/514029.html
Posted by: Hangover Black | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 03:45 PM
Haddin is not gone yet. Don't count your chickens before they cross the road.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 03:51 PM
from an Umpiring point of view the batsman is a left-hander so an appeal for LBW will be viewed in that way.
Thus if Warner missed he may well have been close to LBW.
KP hit a six in England doing this.
Posted by: The Don has Risen | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 06:26 PM
Haddin is not gone yet, but he is inhabiting territory not dissimilar to that of Ian Healy after the 1999 tour of Zimbabwe.
Posted by: Hangover Black | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 06:40 PM
Haddin is heading for Paine
Posted by: The Don has Risen | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 06:49 PM
Speaking of heading for pain: http://www.espncricinfo.com/pakistan-v-england-2012/engine/current/match/531630.html
Posted by: 2BarRiff | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 07:01 PM
I think the batsman should be able to switch hit 15% to the opposing side from his stance -- every batsman does it anyway, and every batsman always has.
Posted by: Professor Rosseforp | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 07:21 PM
The batsman changing stance is an optical illusion.
Posted by: Tony | Friday, February 03, 2012 at 08:32 PM
And his bat was congenitally bent, anyway
Posted by: Professor Rosseforp | Saturday, February 04, 2012 at 04:50 PM
Tim Blair: Keep the Switch on the Pitch.
Posted by: Tony | Sunday, February 05, 2012 at 11:35 AM
This morning on Offsiders Gideon Haigh made a parallel between the 15 degree law and the switch hit. AGB - ahead of the curve, as usual.
Posted by: Tony | Sunday, February 05, 2012 at 01:06 PM
I can tell you who would have been uncontrollably excited at flicking the switch: Spanky Roebuck. Then again, he gets excited over the switch for different reasons than most.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 05, 2012 at 05:49 PM
Boy, I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
Posted by: Yogi Berra | Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 02:16 PM
Almost Yogi: "When you come to a fork in the road, knife it."
Posted by: Tony | Sunday, February 12, 2012 at 02:40 PM