Comments on NONE FOR WONTypePad2012-01-12T04:09:55ZTony Teahttps://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/2012/01/none-for-won/comments/atom.xml/Spark commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef01676075e53f970b2012-01-13T13:18:56Z2012-01-13T13:18:56ZSparkThis match was unique in its own right though - a completed innings with no legitimate deliveries bowled! Apparently a...<p>This match was unique in its own right though - a completed innings with no legitimate deliveries bowled! Apparently a first in Tests.</p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0162ff79ca9f970d2012-01-13T01:27:28Z2012-01-13T01:27:28ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/Reckon that 3/64 in Perth was the match I was thinking of, with both Slogger and Gnome B.N. being dismissed...<p>Reckon that 3/64 in Perth was the match I was thinking of, with <i>both</i> Slogger and Gnome B.N. being dismissed in the chase.</p>Russ commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e56d5557970c2012-01-12T22:12:44Z2012-01-12T22:12:44ZRusshttp://idlesummers.comThere aren't a huge number of low chases with more than 3 wickets lost. Australia's worst recent effort was 64/3...<p>There aren't a huge number of low chases with <a href="http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=4;orderby=team_score;result=1;runsmax2=80;runsval2=runs;template=results;type=team;view=innings;wicketsmin1=3;wicketsval1=wickets" rel="nofollow">more than 3 wickets lost</a>. Australia's worst recent effort was 64/3 against England in Perth. Doesn't hold a candle to NZ's 33/5 vs. West Indies in '87 or Pakistan's 66/7 vs. England in '84.</p>@TKYC commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0167606b9718970b2012-01-12T20:17:17Z2012-01-12T20:17:17Z@TKYChttp://M-365.blogspot.comAnother form of 'None for one'... http://m.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/english-cricketer-guilty-of-matchfixing-20120113-1pxw6.html<p>Another form of 'None for one'...<br />
<a href="http://m.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/english-cricketer-guilty-of-matchfixing-20120113-1pxw6.html" rel="nofollow">http://m.theage.com.au/sport/cricket/english-cricketer-guilty-of-matchfixing-20120113-1pxw6.html</a></p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0162ff6f9db4970d2012-01-12T08:34:23Z2012-01-12T08:34:23ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/For some reason - possibly even because it is true - I thought there was an instance in Australia where...<p>For some reason - possibly even because it is true - I thought there was an instance in Australia where the Aussies, chasing 30-odd, lost three or four wickets.</p>
<p>By the way, my linked list does contain 27 such low chases.</p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0167606395f8970b2012-01-12T07:16:01Z2012-01-12T07:16:01ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/Russ, you were right. Consider it found, fished and published.<p>Russ, you were right. Consider it found, fished and published.</p>m0nty commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e5644e06970c2012-01-12T07:13:46Z2012-01-12T07:13:46Zm0ntyGnome B.N. is a trendsetter.<p>Gnome B.N. is a trendsetter.</p>Russ commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef016760636a94970b2012-01-12T06:54:40Z2012-01-12T06:54:40ZRusshttp://idlesummers.comTony, my comment went awol, although Dave and Jonathan addressed the main points. It was full of links, no doubt...<p>Tony, my comment went awol, although Dave and Jonathan addressed the main points. It was full of links, no doubt typepad thinks I'm a spammer.</p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0162ff6e6cb7970d2012-01-12T06:41:14Z2012-01-12T06:41:14ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/That's a good spot, Dave. As it happens I started off wondering about sides facing a one run target to...<p>That's a good spot, Dave. As it happens I started off wondering about sides facing a one run target to win, but half way changed to sides who only scored one run to win.</p>
<p>I was also looking for sides facing a one run target, who then scored a weird total like 5, courtesy of overthrows, hit helmet, or the like.</p>Jonathan commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e563eb06970c2012-01-12T06:22:06Z2012-01-12T06:22:06ZJonathanhttp://rising-of-the-sun.blogspot.com/You set me wondering who managed to get out chasing the lowest target. Turns out it was the BNG.<p>You set me wondering who managed to get out chasing the lowest target. Turns out it was the BNG.</p>David Barry commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef01676062a955970b2012-01-12T05:36:13Z2012-01-12T05:36:13ZDavid BarryThere are two Tests that you missed, in which the chasing team hit a boundary when they only needed a...<p>There are two Tests that you missed, in which the chasing team hit a boundary when they only needed a single. <a href="http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63169.html" rel="nofollow">Pak v NZ 1976/7</a>, <a href="http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64096.html" rel="nofollow">Eng v WI 2004</a>.</p>Russ commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0162ff6d3d1e970d2012-01-12T04:43:17Z2012-01-12T04:43:17ZRusshttp://idlesummers.comThis list might also be of interest, being lead at the end of the 3rd innings in losses. There were...<p><a href="http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=3;orderby=lead;qualmax1=10;qualmin1=-5;qualval1=lead;result=2;template=results;type=team;view=innings" rel="nofollow">This list might also be of interest</a>, being lead at the end of the 3rd innings in losses. There were also two instances of 1 run 4th innings chases being scored with boundaries, and 3 games where the team lost by an innings and 1. The worst loss of wickets chasing a total of <a href="http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/stats/index.html?class=1;filter=advanced;innings_number=4;orderby=team_score;qualmax2=10;qualmin2=0;qualval2=team_score;result=1;template=results;type=team;view=innings" rel="nofollow">10 or under</a> was <a href="http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/63781.html" rel="nofollow">Sri Lanka</a>, who were 2/0 after 5 balls, and 2/10 after 11. On your last comment, the answer is <a href="http://www.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/match/64026.html" rel="nofollow">Langer</a>.</p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e562ddf9970c2012-01-12T04:34:17Z2012-01-12T04:34:17ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/It's funny. As I was composing the post I was thinking about which Aussie batsmen would get out chasing such...<p>It's funny. As I was composing the post I was thinking about which Aussie batsmen would get out chasing such a daunting target as 1. Hughes obviously came to mind, as did Slatts.</p>Russ commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e562ce46970c2012-01-12T04:30:40Z2012-01-12T04:30:40ZRusshttp://idlesummers.comAustralia has long since started compromising by being 1/1, 2/2, 3/3 etc.<p>Australia has long since started compromising by being 1/1, 2/2, 3/3 etc.</p>Tony commented on 'NONE FOR WON'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef0168e562b652970c2012-01-12T04:25:16Z2012-01-12T04:25:16ZTonyhttp://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/cricket/Any chance we Strayans can get up a protest to turn the alien 1/0 into the earthbound 0/1.<p>Any chance we Strayans can get up a protest to turn the alien 1/0 into the earthbound 0/1.</p>