Crash is on drugs: "a nation still suffering from PWD (post-Warne depression)." Balls! Name me just one person suffering from PWD, just one.
Did anyone see BJ and The Boys on Monday night?. (Mike Hussey, a big AGB fan, actually called it BJ and the Boys.) Mark Waugh mentioned that the bowlers would "appreciate the lively Perth wicket." Now, admittedly this Test will be played on a first-time track which makes it hard to predict what might happen this week, but seriously, where has he been for the last few years? The WACA track has become the dullest in Australia; its current blandness has one pining for days both good and old, when wickets tumbled and matches finished in three days:
ANOTHER lousy pitch, another three-day finish. The players did their best to prolong the contest by sending down nearly 100 no balls and wides in the match, nine of which came in Curtly Ambrose's final over, likely to be the last he will bowl in Australia.
But lump two teams of loping, accurate fast bowlers together on a strip of fractured concrete and an early finish is inevitable, especially with Australia having already won the series.
Naturally it's down to the usual suspects: cricket authorities and official broadcasters (and young people), who have combined to dictate that pitches must, in the sporting parlance, go the distance. Is there any other parlance than sporting parlance?
PS: Injuries have progressed from blight to plague. How long before national sides have "bull pens" instead of eleven players and twelfth men?
CHARACTER ASSASSINATION
You know my opinion on character? Every time someone says "You should meet Joe Bloggs, he's a real character" one person will say "great!" and ten will say "Fvck no." The same thing probably applies to pitches:
A wicket with character . . . about time
It had become lower and slower in recent seasons, continuing the trend of pitches around the world that are losing, or have lost, their character.
Lively wicket, three day contest... question is, do you think we'd win a game like that?
Posted by: Russ | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:25 AM
No, but it would be "quick and painless."
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:31 AM
Seal of approval or kiss of death?
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:45 AM
Get stuffed, baldy.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:47 AM
What's the bet the kid who throws the ball in is a character.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:50 AM
The kid who throws the ball in - that's gold.
Posted by: RT | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 12:11 PM
Back from lunch at Barkly's Hotel, bistro, wine bar, cafe, function room, Tabaret in Heidelberg. The Angus 400g rump was excellent. The air conditioning less excellent. The pokie room like the Day of the Living Dead; surprised there were no brains on the menu.
Back in the office it's hard not to fall asleep; doubly-so with Terry Alderman commentating.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:20 PM
I liked how one of the commentators marvelled that Smith had somehow got an Australian kit bag complete with his name on it and turned up with it at Perth airport, despite only being called upon yesterday. Of course he did, they hand you a complete Australian kit when you play your first game for NSW, everyone knows that.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:33 PM
In fact: all NSW kit comes with a bottle of yellow additive to turn the blue to green, and velcro NSW badges covering the Australian badges.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:42 PM
So, how's that short bowling working out, Windies?
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:52 PM
Odds of PC actually converting his 50 into a ton today?
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:57 PM
The Indestructible Paper Cut of Steel is 50 already and scoring nearly as fast as last night when the Shrees and India tonked it out.
By the way, has a side ever chased a higher score in a one-dayer, and choked?
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 02:59 PM
Betting outlets should frame a market around PC scoring between 96 and 100.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:01 PM
Oh, no.
Gnome B.N. is about to start his 20 minutes of suck-up gibberish.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:03 PM
Crikey, blimey, Nora.
Jim Maxwell even tweets mozz: "watson should get a ton....windies keen but impatient...wacked at the waca"
NO! capital letters? Surely that should be "Windies KEEN! but impatient...WACKED! at the WACA."
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:09 PM
Maxwell knows better than to shout, even if only by tweet. Twitter probably has its own chapter in the ABC Style Guide by now.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:14 PM
Style Guide sounds like such an ABC term, like balsamic vinegar and partner.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:17 PM
G.Nome AND Drew! The is no limit to ABC slurping.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:30 PM
0/106 at the luncheon adjournment.
G.Nome goes controversial: "Let's not get carried away with the Windies in Adelaide. They had the best of the conditions, and yet they couldn't force a win."
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 03:33 PM
G.Nome sounds like a name of a stem cell researcher.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:06 PM
He's named in honour of that famous geneticist, Human G. Nome.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:09 PM
Also, I believe that's the first time an Australian cricketer got 69 in the first session since Brendon Julian toured the local nightclubs.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:11 PM
A Test player and good looking rooster like BJ would have been a Tiger on tour.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:16 PM
Paper Cut out for 89.
There's a shock.
1/132.
His back-monkey is getting bigger.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:40 PM
Typical PC, all the hard work done, thrown away and now he exposes the lower order.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:46 PM
How come whenever a commentator says "Roche" no one follows up with "Bewdy Newk"?
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 04:49 PM
Typical PC, all the hard work done, thrown away and now he exposes the lower order.
Wouldn't it be funny if he exposed his genitals?
Posted by: Big Ramifications | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 05:09 PM
Gnome B.N. is having conniptions of joy every time Punter grimaces. It's rather unseemly.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 05:22 PM
Big : Are you calling Hussey a cvnt? 8-)
Kat needs a 100, Watto really needs a 100, Ponting needs a new elbow, and the scene is set for Huss to charge in and get a career saving and Ashes losing 100.
Posted by: nick | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 05:32 PM
45 minutes in the car, 45 minutes on the phone to Pigbond because my internets were, ahem, borked.
345 minutes - at least it felt that long - of Gnome B.N. and his "flinty eyed, world's toughest Boonie" and "amazing, super-tough Tugger" and "sensational, man of steel Punter" and "miracle" and "astonishing" and "outstanding" and "magnificent" and et cetera and et al and the rest. Massive!
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 06:55 PM
He does go on a bit.
Kat, you peanut.
Posted by: Hangover Black | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Krabs out for 99 to a sucker ball. Is there some law of the universe preventing Aussies from scoring a ton this summer?
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Katich gone for 99, caught in suckerville.
2/260.
Kat, you idiot.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:04 PM
Well, it's unanimous then. Peanut, idiot, sucker. Better not be the sort of dumb dismissal that presages a collapse.
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:07 PM
There was a very odd comment from Roebuck this morning on this lack of hundred's business: "Failing to score a hundred, though, is not a failure at all, merely an omission. A duck is a failure."
Complete tosh. A duck is often unlucky: fresh batsman, good ball, out. Failing to go on from a start means someone else in your side needs to make a start and finish your job. Krab has been repeatedly negligent on this score, Paper Cut is shaping up to be worse. Can't say that the others have been any better either, in the past year or so.
Posted by: Russ | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:13 PM
Shocking shot Pup. Just terrible. Yet another dismissal where he starts believng in the hype about his footwork against spinners and treis to do too much, and the spinner gets him out without trying. Happens all too often.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:23 PM
Clarke - double peanut
Posted by: Hangover Black | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:24 PM
Tony, I have tried searching the archives but to no avail: I can't figure out the etymology of the name Gnome B.N.
Posted by: m0nty | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:35 PM
M0nty: fyi.
Posted by: Russ | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 07:45 PM
Was arriving at trivia when Clarke got out, at which point Dreary Alderman was moved to opine: "Clarke will have his hands in his head."
Posted by: Tony | Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 11:30 PM
Russ: thank you, I knew it would be entertaining.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 12:55 AM
Mont: Yesterday's commentary, with all its massive adjectives, perfectly captured the essence of the Gnome B.N. nickname; especially the relentless legendising of Ponting, and even Punter's wife.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 08:36 AM
For the first time in a while I have gone the TV commentary option for the majority of play rather than the ABC commentary, as the ABC WA team is either Gnome superlative grating or Alderman soporific. That Baggy Green underling sacking shows Gnome's true colours. No telling off and warning of some wag but let's throw some wolf lawyer right at him. Thin skinned turd.
Posted by: RT | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:10 AM
I really wish they had an option for this series like they do on Fox Sports Active for the AFL and the (overseas) cricket, where you can just listen to the crowd noise.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:24 AM
In today's Herald Sun:
Pass the purgative; my bowels are revolting.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:31 AM
On the upside. When the G.Nome gave the myths and legends a spell and instead talked cricket, he was fine. In particular he described, in easy-to-comprehend detail, what was previously wrong with the batting stance of the Indestructible Paper Cut of Steel, and what PC had subsequently done to correct the problem.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM
Tony don't you need continence to go with bowels to get a sentence
Posted by: The Don has risen | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:44 AM
But sometimes you need a colon.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM
Full stop.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 11:51 AM
I note, apropos of not much, that John Alexander has been preselected for the Liberals for the seat of Bennelong.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:12 PM
I get the shits with simplistic commentary. One instance that particularly gets right up my gonga is "It doesn't say 'dropped' in the scorebook". Terry Alderman used this piece of low rent quippery yesterday, while Ian Chappelli is especially fond of "Check it in the paper tomorrow."
On one level it passes muster. A good batsman does indeed treat the vicissitudes of batting with a shrug and a "treat every ball on its merits" sang froid.
But the commentators aren't commentating for the batsman out on the sward, they are commentating for us experts out in radio/TV land. We are discerning beasties who demand more than pat, shallow throw-away lines.
Cheap commentary might wash with fatheads, but have you ever heard an insightful fan ignore an innings where the batsman was dropped several times? Take Flatty Hayden in Adelaide in 1997. Your bland stats gobbler might be impressed by Flatty notching his first Test ton, but your clever clogs shrugs and says "Yeah, but he batted rubbish and was dropped 134 times."
It's a qualification not to be blithely ignored. You can bet your bottomest dollar the selectors don't ignore it.
Do the commentators intentionally diss the listeners? No, I suspect it's worse: they have nothing insightful to say.
Good commentary demands that the commentators dispense with trite observations and, just maybe, have a good hard think about what comes out their cakeholes. Anything less treats the listeners like idiots.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:21 PM
Monty: correction. It's not John Alexander, it's Jay Ay.
If he's as bad a politician as he a commentator, well, you can finish that sentiment for yourself...
On the other hand, if he's as boring a politician as he is a commentator, he'll fit right in. And if he's as parochial a politician as he is a commentator, the Liberal party won't need to worry about him rocking the boat.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:24 PM
What's James doing in Hussey's living room?
Stalky.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:40 PM
Hussey out.
Another ton down the toilet.
4/355.
Will Stalky James do anything dramatic?
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Christ Almighty, have the Baggy Greens been cursed never to score another Test ton?
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:54 PM
Hussey was doomed to fall short of a hundred. Far too many journos and pundits wrote that he was a great chance to break the trend today.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 01:58 PM
Cut & paste?
I'm stuck with the ABC - JL & Drew at the moment - but who needs to see the TV coverage when Hussey keeps getting out the same way.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 02:10 PM
Tony, that RACV guy gives me the creeps. The RACV instant estimate is he's right out of a boy band. Only 4 more days to manouver past that picture and log into this tread I guess.
Posted by: RT | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 02:33 PM
Rich: "Call Jason" has a friend.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 02:38 PM
Question for Hewy: SHOULD Ponting move down the list?
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 02:41 PM
I think he should retire hurt more often. Builds the legend.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 02:47 PM
Haddin might be a goose behind the stumps, but he is a Guus when it comes to knocking up effortless 50s.
Expect him to get out soon.
North's in the red zone, too.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:10 PM
Red Zone!
North hits a knee-high full-toss straight back to Debonaire for a C&B.
5/444.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:16 PM
Someone pointed the bone, I'm telling you. It's freaky. In an Alexander Downer way.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:17 PM
Less Downer, more Catweazle. (Needs Touchwood.)
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:22 PM
Probably the least effective way to get off a quadruple nelson. I suspect Biggy's doing. 80 more runs from the tail and we'll get past that highest innings total without a century record.
Posted by: Russ | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:27 PM
Biggy Bird? Dickie was the nelson specialist, I recall.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:29 PM
David Shepherd.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:33 PM
No, I mean, all these blokes getting out for less than a hundred is Biggy's doing. He was pining after that record in Adelaide, if I recall.
Posted by: Russ | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:38 PM
Honestly, I hang out here a lot and even I need a glossary sometimes.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Or perhaps a dramatis personae.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:41 PM
Wonder what colourful description would accompany "Big Ramifications" in the glossary.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:42 PM
Coming soon: AGB, the Musical.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 03:43 PM
The perils of live cricket: no 7-second delay. Don't think I've heard a West Indian swear before.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 04:24 PM
Red Mist is descending on Klutz.
Look for another cheap out here.
Posted by: Bruce | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 04:39 PM
FFS Klutz! Studs for 100! It's like one of those interviews where they try and use a word they've discussed in the shed just before...Kat wins, closest to the pin
Posted by: Nick | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 04:50 PM
So, back off topic.
What's the record total without a century?
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:07 PM
Declared? I hate declared.
Ponting: building the legend.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:15 PM
Looks like Ponting declared 5 runs short of the world record.
Ponting: dudding the legend.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:24 PM
The politics of declarations. Ponting's main impetus for declaring - which can not be supported empirically when looking at the position of the match in the context of historical precedent - seems to be that it would make him look bad to sit in the sheds nursing the boo-boo on his elbow while nine-ten-jack are batting.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:24 PM
Studs won't ever change will he? Trash, trash, unplayable, trash...
Posted by: Russ | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:27 PM
It's becoming harder and harder not to bracket Studs with Chris Matthews.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:34 PM
At least Studsy can bat.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:38 PM
Oh well, at least Studsy's four overs are done. Now for the rest of this T20 innings.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:53 PM
Carn Clint McKay.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:58 PM
Chris Matthews had a first class average of 20, which probably equates to about 30+ in this era of turbo-charged bats, small grounds and extra batting practice for bowlers. I saw him bat a few times over in WA and he could wield willow.
It was a pity he blew it when he finally made the Test team.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 05:59 PM
Good areas Clint.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:00 PM
Good areas but when you're bowling as accurate and fast as Pigeon without any of Pigeon's crucial height, top batsmen like Gayle can treat you with contempt.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:03 PM
Geez, mOnty, it is only 1cm the difference. I daresay Gayle tries to treat everyone with contempt.
Posted by: Russ | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:08 PM
Gayle's got talent, but right now he's out there having a "nothing to lose" lash at anything.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:11 PM
Clint bowls a maiden! There's your front page right there.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:11 PM
My point is that you rarely saw McGrath, despite his predictable line and length, get a good ball swatted over midwicket.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:12 PM
On reflection, make that a "point to prove" lash at anything.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:20 PM
He certainly proved a point to Nathan. Not entirely sure what that point was, but it's there somewhere within those two sixes.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:42 PM
The point is "we're aiming to make 700 and knock you cocky bastards over for 120 just after tea on day 5".
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:44 PM
I suppose the honchos at the WACA are congratulating themselves on their road-inspired slog-a-thon.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:45 PM
Welcome to the new form of international cricket: T-Test.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 06:50 PM
Nelson! Our last hope dashed.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 07:01 PM
Great sign! The run-rate is down to 5.61.
Posted by: Tony | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 07:06 PM
Correction to my earlier prediction: just after tea on day 4.
Posted by: m0nty | Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 07:15 PM