Plenty of recent commentary about how Straya have been granted a chance recover lost form in the Chadlees against the hapless Vettoris... which means one thing: we are going down. And if, by chance, we do win the Chadlees, we can then only lay claim to being a WBP FTB.
Oh ye of little faith Tony. Warner will blast those kiwi pie chuckers to all parts, Ponting and Clarke will run the field ragged with sharp seconds, the Hussey's will flog Harry Potter out of the attack inside two overs.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 04:50 PM
Another day of sloppy sloppy cricket from the Aussies.
2 headless runouts. 2 soft prods to short cover. 1 headless run down the pitch to chop on. These guys value their wickets at penny a pound.
Posted by: Bruce | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 05:57 PM
I wonder if Tasmania are sick of bowling to Phil Hughes yet. 70 not out he is now, this season he's taken them for 442 runs in 4 innings @ 140.7, 2 100s, 2 50s. Jaques failed twice, Rogers scored 93. I still they'll pick Jaques.
Awful out from Hussey. No worse than anyone else mind you.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 06:26 PM
Russ
In response to Comment 1, can I just say this: you are absolutely spot off.
Bruce
It's the story of the summer.
Russ
Spanky has inked him in.
Been in the car listening on the wahless. Just got home.
Alderman: "Hussey and Haddin are just starting to build a nice platform." Out.
Gnome B.N.: "Hussey has taken the power play. He should just about be able to reach his century here." (True! He said that.) Out.
It's funny how Boynton reacts when Glenn Mitchell DOES HIS!!! thing. "I wish he would stop doing that!"
Posted by: Tony T | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 06:40 PM
Frankly Tony, I blame you. We were going fine before you started this sub-blog.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 06:52 PM
Monty
You have a point.
But in keeping with recent Melbourne tradition all I have to say is "I blame Russ."
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 07:15 PM
The cricket, the tennis or Rogue Assassin?
Is Jason Statham now in EVERY action movie?
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 07:20 PM
Fvck it!
I changed the comment order.
So there.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 07:21 PM
McCullum LB second ball of Larry Tait.
A dreadful fvcken decision.
He hit it so hard, if his pads weren't in the way it would have almost gone for six. Almost.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 07:47 PM
It's all coming up roses for Straya this summer: SOS just did a hammy.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:09 PM
The injury XI
Jaques
Marsh
.
Clarke (thumb?)
.
Symonds
.
Lee
Clark
McGain
Siddle
Can we fill some more spots before the end of this game?
Posted by: nick | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:14 PM
Now there's an idea. Maybe we can reverse the batting order, so Mitch Johnson can open. He's got better technique and stamina that Warner.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:19 PM
On the Injury XI, don't forget Watson.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:24 PM
Watson's the Captain-Coach.
(As long as Chappelli says it's OK.)
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:28 PM
This is a lot like the Test series. We bat poorly and think we're done. Then it's the Kiwis' turn to bat, and we remember: oh yeah, they're even more shizen than us.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:46 PM
There's life in the old flightless birds yet. Once we turn to our scrubbers, their scrubbers should be able to milk a few.
This summer we've often looked set to break through, but we've always ended up one wicket short of causing a collapse.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:57 PM
Completely fvcken sick of the commentators spruiking shit shows they wouldn't come within 22 yards, or a chain, of watching.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 08:58 PM
Only a very foolish captain would bowl his scrubbers. If they aren't 7 or 8 down by the 40th over we are gone anyway. Less is we don't get Taylor out real soon now.
I was thinking Mitch'd be a better opener than Warner when he got out. So yes, it is my fault.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:09 PM
Does Tait qualify as a scrubber?
And, umm.
Does Ponting qualify as a V.F. Captain?
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:13 PM
Who's been putting things in Richie's medicine?
He's hallucinating if he thinks Studsy's caught-and-bowled is "the greatest catch he'll ever take."?
I put it to you, members of the jury, that the one Studsy missed at third-man was a tougher catch.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:15 PM
Tony, yes, to both.
A good captain would have slip, us needing wickets and all.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:24 PM
Although to be fair to Tait, he bowled pretty well today.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:26 PM
Tell ya what!
At normal speed that catch and toss by Hussey off Elliot had a touch of the World Cup Gibbs about it.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 09:35 PM
I wonder if Haddin will call that poor Kiwi back. Could be a teensy little scandal, that dismissal, all made in NSW.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:24 PM
Nup. Oh well, at least the commentators caught it. Like Haddin did.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:26 PM
Pretty average bit of keeping that (or a touch of genius?)...surely having your gloves in front of the stumps is a fairly basic wicketkeeping error?
Posted by: nick | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:26 PM
Bloody hell.
Haddin did what Hoges did in a skit about 30 years ago: knocked the bails off to make it look like the batsman was bowled.
Cheaty? I reckon Haddin had 'an idea what had happened. Just like Greg Dyer against the Flightless Ones all those years ago.
Back then Heals was almost ready to roll, and now it would be a good enough reason to get rid of Klutz Haddin, IF there was a worthy replacement.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:28 PM
Headline in tomorrow's Otago Opinion: Aussie Underglove Stinks!
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:31 PM
Ordinary lack of awareness by the umps, has to be said. The squarey should have picked up that something was off.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 10:43 PM
Gilly: "These power plays... you just can't predict what will happen."
Yes, you can. Straya will get spanked.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 11:00 PM
Why do we not bowl Tait out early? He's crap in the late game.
Posted by: m0nty | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 11:03 PM
m0nty, ditto for Johnson. Actually, if one applied the lessons of 20/20 you'd be bowling the spinners in the late overs, scrubbers or no.
Posted by: Russ | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 11:17 PM
Interesting from Gilly...'he minded in India'...
Posted by: nick | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 11:17 PM
The Kiwis reminded me of Melbourne fans after we beat West Coast in Round 20.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Sunday, February 01, 2009 at 11:49 PM
Scrubbers!
Posted by: RT | Monday, February 02, 2009 at 10:20 AM
In other news - the ICC have reinstated the original result of the Pakistani forfeit.
http://content-aus.cricinfo.com/ci-icc/content/current/story/388625.html
Only about 2 years too late - but positive progress nevertheless.
Posted by: Bruce | Monday, February 02, 2009 at 11:01 AM
Indeed.
A good sign.
Although I wouldn't go this far:
I'm just posting about it.
Posted by: Tony Tea | Monday, February 02, 2009 at 11:11 AM
Ricky has inserted the sprigs into the gob.
I reckon the replay shows that Haddin knew he'd fvcked and looked around to see if anyone had noticed and then stayed with TFOAC's celebrations. So I wonder if Ricky will be acknowledge that Dan is spot on the money with his assessment?
Posted by: Bruce | Monday, February 02, 2009 at 01:31 PM
Klutz Haddin knew what he was doing alright. But Ponting pretty much has to stick by his keeper, even if he does sound like a goose.
Posted by: Tony T | Monday, February 02, 2009 at 03:15 PM
In the paper The Age this morn, the hapless puffery continues. Ponting repeating ad infinitum, "If the replays show Haddin was in the right, we'll certainly have something to say to Dan."
Centimetres above Rick's soft soap is a series of photos showing Haddin with gloves clearly ahead of stumps.
It's all a bit Monty Python really.
Posted by: via collins | Tuesday, February 03, 2009 at 01:55 PM
Ponting is a twit, he should learn from Arsene Wenger: "I trust in the integrity of my players"; "I didn't see this incident"; "We will move on".
Haddin meanwhile is claiming the ball does magic tricks, admitting he had his gloves in front of the stumps, but still claiming the ball rebounded forward and up off the bail first before doing a funky u-turn to land in his gloves. Here it is from side-on:
Posted by: Russ | Tuesday, February 03, 2009 at 06:07 PM
The other thing that is interesting about this, is if Haddin hadn't of had his gloves there, there is a fair chance the ball would have clipped the top of the bail (it is very close). So if the game had of been officiated correctly, we'd be talking about Haddin's continued gross incompetency, costing his side a wicket and a run by putting his gloves too far forward.
Posted by: Russ | Tuesday, February 03, 2009 at 07:08 PM
Both Ponting and Haddin are gooses. Absolutely spot on, Russ: "I trust in the integrity of my players"; "I didn't see this incident"; "We will move on". The media are waiting for the players to buy in. Give 'em nothing.
Speaking of which: "lump of sit".
The thing about Haddin's take is the way he snatched at the ball. No keeper should ever go after the ball like that. Let it come, you klutz.
Posted by: Tony T | Tuesday, February 03, 2009 at 10:14 PM
What was the square leg Umpire doing when Haddin hit the stumps.
NO wicket-keeper puts his gloves in front of the stumps as it means not out with regard to stumping.
Is Haddin like Laxman in that his batting is not good enough to overcome his fielding/wicket-keeping?
Posted by: The Don has risen | Wednesday, February 04, 2009 at 12:39 PM