You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
'THANK goodness the chucker has been ruled out of the World Cup. He will not be missed. He does not belong on a cricket field anywhere, let alone representing his country in the game's most prized event'.
"Akhtar's willingness to mess with the ball was evident in the same contest. Although they were loath to admit it, the umpires repeatedly scrutinised the ball and were clearly unhappy with its condition. Subsequently, Akhtar's county colleagues talked openly about the methods he used to disrupt the ball.
Shahid Afridi, a fellow traveller, was just as brazen. No wonder umpires keep a wary eye on their comrades. Darrell Hair might have overstepped the mark at the Oval but his concerns were well founded."
So what's the Spanky solution - send in the UN? If the ICC had one cag half the size of one of Hairs world cricket would be better for it. The Spanky non-solutions are all bark.
In AFL news, what I want to know is why didn't Hawthorn didn't take the opportunity to play the song "He aint heavy, he's my brother" over the PA at Launceston yesterday?
It would have been the mother of all sledges. Opportunities like that shouldn't be wasted.
I think ball tampering should be mandatory for the World Cup. Every player should be assigned sandpaper for varying qualities. You never know it may make the run totals slightly lower
'THANK goodness the chucker has been ruled out of the World Cup. He will not be missed. He does not belong on a cricket field anywhere, let alone representing his country in the game's most prized event'.
What he should have written...
Posted by: nick | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 12:21 PM
Took the words right out of my post, Nick.
Posted by: Tony.T | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 12:23 PM
"Akhtar's willingness to mess with the ball was evident in the same contest. Although they were loath to admit it, the umpires repeatedly scrutinised the ball and were clearly unhappy with its condition. Subsequently, Akhtar's county colleagues talked openly about the methods he used to disrupt the ball.
Shahid Afridi, a fellow traveller, was just as brazen. No wonder umpires keep a wary eye on their comrades. Darrell Hair might have overstepped the mark at the Oval but his concerns were well founded."
So what's the Spanky solution - send in the UN? If the ICC had one cag half the size of one of Hairs world cricket would be better for it. The Spanky non-solutions are all bark.
Posted by: pat | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 02:49 PM
Correct.
I deem the old saying "All over the place like a mad woman's shit" to now be "all over the place like a mad Spanky's article".
Posted by: Tony.T | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 02:52 PM
If all the teams just sat on the beach, and they replayed the Champions Trophy on TV, would anyone care?
Posted by: nick | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 04:37 PM
So how come, in Spankyworld, Shoaib's a chucker but Murali's not?
Posted by: Gareth | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 04:45 PM
So how come, in Spankyworld, Shoaib's a chucker but Murali's not?
Posted by: Gareth | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 04:45 PM
Nick: That reminds me. Is the Beach Bolloxxxx still going?
Gaz: To paraphrase Spankles "It doesn't matter for spinners. They don't bowl fast enough to matter."
Gaz: To paraphrase Spankles "It doesn't matter for spinners. They don't bowl fast enough to matter."
Posted by: Tony.T | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 04:50 PM
Tony: Mad woman's shit indeed.
Tony: Mad woman's shit indeed.
Posted by: Gareth | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 04:53 PM
stoppit you two, you're making me go cross eyed.
Posted by: os | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 05:39 PM
Hey Gaz, isn't it about time you took up blogging again?
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 09:09 PM
Does anybody else think that Pascoe is looking more and more like Dalziel?
Posted by: chrisl | Friday, March 02, 2007 at 11:12 PM
It's the other was around; Dalziel is trying to look like Pascoe.
JTS.
Posted by: Tony.T | Saturday, March 03, 2007 at 09:24 AM
Just found out that this is what the kids are singing at school these days:
"I believe I can fly
but I was shot by the FBI.
All I wanted was a chicken wing,
but they shot me in the ding-a-ling."
Very inventive IMO with an appropriate disregard for the R Kelly's mawkish sentiments. I wonder if your TAFE kids can come up with anything better?
Posted by: pat | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 10:35 AM
In AFL news, what I want to know is why didn't Hawthorn didn't take the opportunity to play the song "He aint heavy, he's my brother" over the PA at Launceston yesterday?
It would have been the mother of all sledges. Opportunities like that shouldn't be wasted.
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | Sunday, March 04, 2007 at 11:16 AM
Pat: Apologies to C Berry, too.
Wicky: Launceston are gunshy after last year' siren-fiasco-brouhaha-ruckus-gate.
Posted by: Tony.T | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 10:28 AM
I guess so, Tony.
Maybe we should send him a sympathy card via the Carlton FC then? Or ads to funeral homes and the like?
There's really no limit to my depravity, I know.
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 01:20 PM
Can you believe they missed the siren again at Launceston?
I thought, after last year's fark-up, they'd installed one of those 1950's air-raid sirens driven by a chevvy engine.
Posted by: Tony.T | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 03:26 PM
Actually, if this story is correct, a gun might not be a bad thing for them to have handy. At least they'd hear it.
Posted by: carneagles | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 04:08 PM
They aren't very horny in Tasmania then?
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 04:09 PM
That'll teach me for not hitting refresh.
What they need is one of these little beauties. They'd hear it in Portsea on a good day.
Posted by: carneagles | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 04:11 PM
Wicky: Boom. Tish.
Carny: Yeah, that's the baby. (Good to see you haven't been snaffled by the CCC.)
Posted by: Tony.T | Monday, March 05, 2007 at 05:28 PM
I think ball tampering should be mandatory for the World Cup. Every player should be assigned sandpaper for varying qualities. You never know it may make the run totals slightly lower
Posted by: Russell Allen | Wednesday, March 07, 2007 at 11:05 AM