« THE KING OF TAUTS | Main | BODE WARRIORS »

TOO DOWN

From the Sunday Age Giant Snodger... it's only a small mistake, but, well, someone has to do the descent thing:

Posted by on 30 March 2009 at 16:20 in Crosswords |

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

es-lessness

Posted by: boynton | 30 March 2009 at 17:45

Poibly jut an honet mitake.

Posted by: Tony T | 30 March 2009 at 18:47

A recent descant on the decent descent?

Posted by: TimT | 31 March 2009 at 11:20

Hopefully they'll recant on this recent decency.

Posted by: TimT | 31 March 2009 at 11:24

You should be cited for Indescant Exposure.

Posted by: Tony T | 31 March 2009 at 12:26

Well spotted -- "performed" should really be spelled as it is now pronounced in Australian English, viz. "preformed" -- you can hear this linguistic preformance on most sportscasts, but also on "So you think you can dance" -- which all you guys should be watching.

Posted by: Professor Rosseforp | 31 March 2009 at 19:14

Mark Allen, the bloke what pundicates the glof on SEN, is relentlessly castigated for his pre-dilection for pre-formed.

Posted by: Tony Tea | 31 March 2009 at 20:02

Tony T, is glof the game where you use a culb to hit a blla into a hloe?

Posted by: Professor Rosseforp | 01 April 2009 at 19:05

Indeed it is. Not to be confused with toofy.

Posted by: Tony | 02 April 2009 at 12:45

More cross words. This weak's dictionary crossword: 17 Down is missing an 's' after the first word; what's with 9 Down the answer seems to be 'bandit' but why? Or perhaps the answer is 'pandit' but I don't think Ned knew any Vedas off by heart.

Posted by: Martin | 07 June 2009 at 18:27

Martin: Finally got around to it last night.

Yep, agree. "Teacher" needs to be "teachers" to become HECTARES.

No idea about BANDIT. Will post it over at DA Trippers. The cruciverbalists there should be able to light some shed.

Posted by: Tony | 09 June 2009 at 08:27

I saw the post over at DA Trippers and I guess that is the correct analysis but hardly satisfying.

Posted by: Martin | 09 June 2009 at 11:17

The comments to this entry are closed.