Comments on CHUCKEYETypePad2007-11-13T19:50:00ZTony Teahttps://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/tag:typepad.com,2003:https://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2007/11/chuckeye/comments/atom.xml/Mark commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f96aef388342007-11-14T17:58:57Z2007-11-14T17:58:57ZMarkhttp://www.reverseswingmanifesto.blogspot.comI was getting bored with all this, started thinking 'oh what the fuck, just let him bowl goddamit'. Then -...<p>I was getting bored with all this, started thinking 'oh what the fuck, just let him bowl goddamit'.</p>
<p>Then - I started thinking, that's exactly what they want.</p>
<p>Eternal vigiliance required.</p>
<p>Though sometimes I think I'm the only asshat in the UK actually worried about the future credibilty of the game we love - nothing serious then.</p>Uncle J Rod commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f961d2a88342007-11-14T04:59:14Z2007-11-14T04:59:14ZUncle J Rodhttp://cricketwithballs.com/I got 5 bucks, anyone else want to chip in?<p>I got 5 bucks, anyone else want to chip in?</p>Tony T. commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f82752d88332007-11-14T00:18:17Z2007-11-14T00:18:17ZTony T.http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/Specifically in the Third Test with 2 for 50 off 19 and 3 for 42 off 17.<p>Specifically <a href="http://aus.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/2003-04/AUS_IN_SL/SCORECARDS/AUS_SL_T3_24-28MAR2004.html" rel="nofollow">in the Third Test</a> with 2 for 50 off 19 and 3 for 42 off 17. </p>Tony T. commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f95ea5988342007-11-14T00:07:51Z2007-11-14T00:07:51ZTony T.http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/Could be right, Bruce. That's the tour when he unveiled The Boofra.<p>Could be right, Bruce.</p>
<p>That's the tour when he unveiled <a href="http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2004/05/the_boofra.html" rel="nofollow">The Boofra</a>.</p>Bruce commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f82735588332007-11-14T00:05:07Z2007-11-14T00:05:07ZBrucehttp://dilletante.tenpm.com.auI reckon the batsman in question would be Boof. He was picking everything Murali sent down and was advising others...<p>I reckon the batsman in question would be Boof.</p>
<p>He was picking everything Murali sent down and was advising others on what to look for. One of the best cricketing brains too.</p>Tony T. commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f82671688332007-11-13T22:43:33Z2007-11-13T22:43:33ZTony T.http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/Which player made all the runs? Dunno. But it is Hayden, Kandy territory.<p>Which player made all the runs? Dunno. But it is <a href="http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/2004/03/broad_of_the_pi.html" rel="nofollow">Hayden, Kandy territory</a>.</p>nick commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f82605c88332007-11-13T22:01:02Z2007-11-13T22:01:02ZnickHmm, which player made all the runs in that series? I will be happy to provide my high resolution binocular...<p>Hmm, which player made all the runs in that series?</p>
<p>I will be happy to provide my high resolution binocular visual system to the ICC for a fraction of $1 million. Anyway, just slo-mo video every match Murali plays in, and then take the footage, show only the arm, get a group of Indian/Sri Lankan/Pakistani guys of similar appearance to bowl/chuck as they see fit, blur the skin slightly so you can't pick Murali, and arrange a double blind viewing in front of retired umpires and players. The truth will out.</p>Tony T. commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f8255ea88332007-11-13T21:21:26Z2007-11-13T21:21:26ZTony T.http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/Noice: An Australian player, who played against Murali in 2004, said the television images of him being tested at UWA...<p>Noice:</p>
<blockquote>An Australian player, who played against Murali in 2004, said the television images of him being tested at UWA a few weeks later bore little resemblance to the action of the bowler who claimed 28 wickets in that series.</blockquote>Tony T. commented on 'CHUCKEYE'tag:typepad.com,2003:6a00d8341cb34453ef00e54f95b1b488342007-11-13T20:25:45Z2007-11-13T20:25:45ZTony T.http://aftergrogblog.blogs.com/agb/Is the "back page lead" IN the Herald Sun or ON the Herald Sun?<p>Is the "back page lead" <i>IN</i> the Herald Sun or <i>ON</i> the Herald Sun?</p>