I love The Sun.
« BEAT IS MURDER | Main | BACK IN BLACK »
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
« BEAT IS MURDER | Main | BACK IN BLACK »
I love The Sun.
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Charles also loves his sons. I'm sure he is very caring in the way he rears them.
Posted by: SB | 14 January 2005 at 15:23
I can imagine he'd be fairly pissed off, though. Pretty stupid stunt from Hal, me thinks.
Posted by: Tony.T | 14 January 2005 at 15:26
Have to say, very witty headline!
Posted by: Dave | 14 January 2005 at 20:36
Tee hee.
That's actually really funny.
Harry needs a good spankin', and I know just the girl to do it.
Posted by: Darlene | 14 January 2005 at 21:01
Prince Charles rears his sons? I hope you have evidence to back up this scurrilous claim, SB. Preferably photographic.
Posted by: hungbunny | 14 January 2005 at 22:26
What do you think of this though - possibly more offensive than Harry's outfit was the fact the theme of the party was "colonials and natives". Prince William went as a lion.
Posted by: edward staines | 14 January 2005 at 22:33
Surely this pampered oaf has advisors who would point out to him the 'error' of dressing up as a nazi- after all isn't he turd in line to the throne ? Did he learn anything about Auschwitz and the Nazi atrocities at school ? It must be in the blood- isn't Prince Phillip the one who talked of 'slitty eyes' when returning from a trip to the Orient ?
Posted by: Brett Pee | 15 January 2005 at 01:48
Let's face it (excuse my language TonyT) the young prince is just an obnoxious wanker.
Just what we want to see in the Royal Family.
Posted by: Darlene | 15 January 2005 at 11:42
Yes, the headline is very funny. The Sun one's not bad either. No really, The Sun is the paper all budding punsters need to measure their wordplay against. The NY Post isn't bad either.
It's staggering that after Harry was advised he better not go dressed in an SS uniform, he didn't then think a Swastika was also somewhat ill-advised.
In short: A goose.
Posted by: Tony.T | 15 January 2005 at 14:50
You latched on to that rather quickly, hungbunny. I think you might be a bit of a bunghoney yourself.
Posted by: SB | 15 January 2005 at 16:38
Has this family not heard of publicists?????? *slaps forhead*
Posted by: AdventureGirl | 15 January 2005 at 17:48
Really though, Addy, he shouldn't have needed one. A publicist, that is. He could have done with a slap in the head.
But common sense should have kicked in somewhere along his thought process.
Posted by: Tony.T | 15 January 2005 at 18:37
Poms need a new royal family right now Tony- perhaps they can find one in Austria or Germany, the latest embarassment showing up clown prince Hal as a "lout". A 20 yr old, yeah...but a closetted, ignorant one & probably receiving some ludicrous allowance to 'live' off for the rest of his privileged existence.
I'm not a big fan of their royal family- more for prince Phillip and his preposterous ponderings-but this latest generation of royal slackers are being recognised for the prize Drongo's they are.
If they import a new royal family, chances are it's members know more about English history than prince charle's dopey offspring & probably speak the queens english better too. Or they could import a family from the remote country of Tuva-where the blokes have developed a strange system of "throat singing" and strange grunts- sounds pretty too similar to the present set of idiots !!
The pampered Pom prince is probably atypical of his generation, something like 60% not having heard of Auschwitz- they probably think he's a footie player !! Harry will not properly understand what his Swastika represented- apparently he has no intention of apologising. Fool.
Charles should cut off his allowance (or something else) and let him loose on society.
Posted by: Brett Pee | 18 January 2005 at 04:37
I've finally worked out how to do trackback. Only taken me a month.
Enough about me, anyway.
Posted by: Darlene | 20 January 2005 at 19:45