If it happens you've arrived here from Harry Hutton's notorious profanity blog with the express purpose of being, you know, "funny" by swearing and cursing and generally writing hideous things, please do me the courtesy of at least spelling your nastiness correctly.
I appreciate context and precision, you understand.
And by "spelling your nastiness", I don't mean Y-O-U-R N-A ... etc. That would be particularly un-fucking-funny.
Harry deleted my nasty post even though it had no swearing and no spelling mistakes, but left alone other posts with all sorts of errors and swearing.
The man has no principles and a strange aversion to fisting. Actually I'm not so sure it is an aversion rather than a guilty recognition of his own depravity.
I suspect that many bloggers are perverts of one sort or another and that blogging is just something they do after cleaning up the mess from their last lustful episode.
I wonder if we can match bloggers to their particular perversions? For example I have long suspected that there are a lot of watersports going on in the billabong of the good Professor Bunyip.
I also had a nightmare about falling into Margo Kingston's cavernous slimy twat. The more I struggled to get out the more I became drenched with her noxious juices and the more excited she became until at last she blasted me out of there in an explosion of screaming ecstacy.
Posted by: Splatterbottom | 03 December 2004 at 17:58
Firstly, as I'm a blogger, you can unload on me if you like. I have perversions. An unhealthy addiction to sport and late night TV top a long list.
Regarding Harry and CML, I never got to read your comment, Splatters, but if the tripe above and your other comments at CML are anything to go by, I'm not fussed I missed out and nor am I'm surprised he axed it.
I don't know Harry other than from his excellent blog, but I'm pretty sure his only depravity is a fixation with Ultimate Fighting combined with an unfortunate tendency to bump into people with problems in the teeth department. Hopefully the two aren't connected.
However, nothing he's ever written leads me to believe he's not one of the most intelligent and witty bloggers going around.
He's certainly not some kind of sick perv and by writing what you wrote up there and over at CML, you revealed you totally misread the tone of his blog, and mine, for that matter.
So have a little bit more of a read around and pick up on things before you jump in all porno gung-ho (an attitude, like your name, that reveals more about you than any "pervert" blogger) and make a total tool of yourself, if you haven't already done so.
And while I share your disdain for Margo, I'd never be stupid enough to go in print with the shit you wrote.
Posted by: Tony.T | 03 December 2004 at 19:05
I'd give Margo one, don't you worry about that.
Posted by: Ferombah Hynde | 03 December 2004 at 23:41
Perverted bloggers? Perish the thought. Now, back to the German dwarf - where's my rubber glove?
Posted by: Adam 1.0 | 04 December 2004 at 00:01
Oh my my, what bunch of sickos we are here! A little comment and evereyone gets all righteous on me. I'm sure Harry can enjoy himself without your tongue so firmly planted in his twitching anus, although the extra stimulation no doubt helps. The real fun begins when you finally get your fist out and come clean with your innermost secret desires.
Posted by: Splatterbottom | 04 December 2004 at 02:27
I don't know about disidain for Margot, also I don't know about giving her one, or, more likely, many - I mean why do you think God gave me two hands? It wasn't just to slap her about for being a stupid bint.
I suffer from the normal cravings and impulses - its just that when I say them out loud people like to pretend they are different and better. They are not - one twitching sphincter is as good as another.
I agree with you about Harry and is blog, and I didn't mean to imply otherwise, but what is wrong about being open about our real desires?
Posted by: Splatterbottom | 04 December 2004 at 03:44
I must admit that the description of Margo's inner sanctum was illuminating to say the least. It's surprising how if you write about topics people consider taboo in a manner normally reserved for describing the pitch at the MCG, that the average reader has a kind of mental disconnect between the style and the substance. I personally think that the imagery portrayed is disturbing, but the method was quite concise.
As for Harry, well, what's to say other than I haven't laughed as loud or as long since at least Latham was elected to lead the ALP to a magnificent electoral victory.
Posted by: CB | 04 December 2004 at 10:25
Latham - now there is someone worth anal-ysing! I may have my eccentricities, but I'm willing to bet that Mad Mark has more than his share of interesting habits, particularly when he is alone with Julia Gillard.
Posted by: SB | 04 December 2004 at 13:07
Mate, i actually resent the fact that some bloggers are described as lonely, sad, sadistic/masochistic, filthy, degenerate old perverts as these traits are genuinely quite decent and most of us would quite happily live to live in an eternal state of depraved lunacy. Lucky Bastards.
Posted by: Brett Pee | 04 December 2004 at 21:14
I'd definatley go Gillard. Parliamentary MILF action to the extreme.
Posted by: Adam 1.0 | 05 December 2004 at 01:37
Brett,
we're not all old, though.
Posted by: Dirk Thruster | 05 December 2004 at 06:44
You people are sick! SICK I tell you.
Now, Adam hand over that glove. I've got some ... err ... some ... you know ... housework to do.
Ahem.
Posted by: Tony.T | 05 December 2004 at 11:48
Brett I love the expression "eternal state of depraved lunacy". The combination of splrltuality and perversion sounds like the foundation of a great (and profitable) religion. I think "O Come All Ye Faithful" should be its anthem.
Good luck with the glove of love Tony. Let us know if you reach Nirvana.
Posted by: SB | 05 December 2004 at 14:13
Never liked Nirvana, Essbee, but I'd possibly use the glove to stuff in Gillard's mouth. Awful accent.
Posted by: Tony.T | 05 December 2004 at 15:24
The accent is indeed a shockah. She sounds like an old woman.
I'd still give her a fearsome pounding, but.
Hmmm.... it might save time if I only mentioned those women whom I would NOT shag.
Posted by: Ferombah Hynde | 05 December 2004 at 15:45
Carmen Lawrence?
Posted by: Tony.T | 05 December 2004 at 16:39
Imagine Kim and Carmen covered in crisco and going hard at it - the earth would certainly move. In fact WA would probably break off and drift away into the Indian Ocean creating massive tidal waves.
Posted by: SB | 05 December 2004 at 17:54
How about Dick Adams and Amanda Vanstone?
Now that's a whole lotta love!
Posted by: Ferombah Hynde | 05 December 2004 at 18:19
WLL, great song.
Posted by: Tony.T | 05 December 2004 at 18:57
WLL is a fine song, based on an old Muddy Waters song, updated by the Small Faces and appropriated by LZ.
Posted by: SB | 05 December 2004 at 20:40
Good article that, SB.
Mind you, if ALL modern music acts were held to account over where they got their songs, we'd have a very, very, very small group of songs to listen to.
Posted by: Tony.T | 06 December 2004 at 11:56