Is it a coincidence - is it even a surprise, as Malcolm Conn suggests? - that Australia is lowly ranked in T20 and that most of Australia's highest ranked T20 players come from outside the Test Group, supposedly the best players?
Aussies pretty rank at Twenty20 cricket
NEW rankings for Twenty20 cricket confirm one unpalatable truth - Australia is not very good at the shortest form of the game.
Most embarrassing for Australia is that of the three bowlers ranked amongst the top 20, two no longer play in the national team.
Anyway, T20, yawn, the rest of Malcolm's article is a pisser:
The other big surprise is that England, such a dud at one-day cricket, has such a competitive T20 side.
Currently being flogged in a one-day series in India, England has never won the 50-over World Cup, which began in 1975.
The first piece of truly international silverware England won was the T20 World Cup in the West Indies last year.
This has not stopped England's T20 captain Stuart Broad crowing about being the leading side.
England's Irishman, Eoin Morgan, is the highest-ranked batsman after scoring 569 runs at an average of 47.41 in 18 T20s.
Fittingly, the only other England batsman in the top 20 is one of their South Africans, Kevin Pietersen, who is ranked No.3.
Malcolm rarely lets an opportunity slip to slate the Englands for their reliance on colonials.