HI, TECH
For a moment I thought the bit below read "allowing each team to lodge up to three challenges per innings". Fat lot of good that would have done in Sydney. Naturally, I read it again. Three "unsuccessful" challenges works for me. (Who will be the first team to call for more?)
Australia wary of ICC proposal
ALREADY under unprecedented pressure, Test umpires may have their decisions challenged by players under an International Cricket Council proposal for expanded use of technology, which has drawn scepticism from Australian coach Tim Nielsen.
Cricket Australia is reserving its judgement until director Mark Taylor, a member of the ICC's cricket committee, presents the detailed recommendations upon his return from Dubai.
But Nielsen warned that such a system, allowing each team to lodge up to three unsuccessful challenges per innings, could slow down the game and create more intense conjecture about decisions.
Similarly, I'm not philosophically opposed to a predictless Hawkeye.
It is expected umpires would have at their disposal "Hawk-Eye" to judge whether a batsman has been struck in line with the stumps in leg-before-wicket decisions, stump microphones to determine whether there is an edge in caught behind appeals, and "Super Slow-Mo" for close bat-pad decisions.
They could not, however, use Hawk-Eye to predict the trajectory of the ball in lbw calls. Nor could they use "Snicko" or the infra-red "Hot Spot" technology used in television broadcasts.
As we are all aware around these parts, the problem with Hawk, apart from it being a sly excuse for Nine to plug ACA, CSI and other upcoming programs, is its inability to accurately predict trajectory after the ball has bounced; especially when the spinners are on. But using it, for instance, to see if the ball has pitched outside leg is definitely a valid application. Not that you couldn't do that with super slow-mo or freeze-frame. I generally try to avoid getting between Nine and a good gadget.
I wonder why the umpires will be allowed to use stump microphones and won't be allowed to use Hot Spot. I'm not wild about Snicko.
Anyhoo, what's Tim Nielsen been smoking?
Nielsen warned that such a system... could create more intense conjecture about decisions.
A crack research team comprised of Isaac Newton, Louis Pasteur, James Cook, Hercule Poirot, Phileas Fogg and every single winner of The Price Is Right would struggle to unearth any more "intense conjecture about decisions" than existed last summer.
Posted by Tony on Thursday, May 8, 2008 at 20:10 | Comments (17)
Category: Cricket (462)
INTEMPERATE SOMERSET WORRIER
In light of Rollerboy's recent slap-headedness, the excellent Patrick Carlyon harks back to the summer of Spank:
Reason out in trial of character
INDIAN spinner Harbhajan Singh the other day slapped an opposition bowler and national teammate after playing out a Twenty20 match in the Indian Premier League. He was rubbed out for 11 matches.
Of itself, the incident is of little consequence and hardly surprising. Singh has always been cranky and petulant. If he was to be called a tosser, the label need not pertain to his bowling action.
Posted by Tony on Friday, May 2, 2008 at 12:55 | Comments (4)
Category: Cricket (462)
SLAA PI
Intemperate slap warrior: "I was misunderstood."
AN altercation between Test teammates Harbhajan Singh and Sreesanth has rocked the Indian Premier League.
Off-spinner Singh, playing for Mumbai Indians, slapped Indian teammate Sreesanth, playing for the Punjab Kings, across the face in a bitter aftermath to yesterday's match in Mohali.
Sreesanth was left sobbing after the altercation.
Can't work out which is more bizarre. Rollerboy slapping Shreediot, or Shreediot having a blub.
WASTE OF SPACE

Posted by Tony on Sunday, April 27, 2008 at 12:15 | Comments (20)
Category: Cricket (462)
CARNA KITTS
The IPL Twenny Twenny starts tomorrow. I'm not going to blog every match, I'm not even going to watch every match - is it on telly? - but there ought to be plenty to comment on; if not on the field, then certainly off it. So, for the next few weeks make this here your one-stop ink-blot for everything Quicket.

Posted by Tony on Thursday, April 17, 2008 at 11:40 | Comments (13)
Category: Cricket (462)
WHAT A SILLY CLUNT
Gold from Gaz, hereby preserved for posterior:
The Perils of Calling it how you see it
Davis steps out, hits this high up in to the air, he will be caught. Oh no they've fucked it up the Tigers! Anderson went out to try to get it backward of square.
~~ Clint Wheeldon, ABC Perth
Posted by Tony on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 at 19:05 | Comments (3)
Category: Cricket (462)
SPOKH TOO SOON
Whitey Flanagan in today's Age:
My good news story of the week? An interview with Harbhajan Singh as he was leaving. The Indian media's response to the one-day finals has not been encouraging — headlines such as "A Victory over Australian Pride and Prejudice" — but the Sikh who calls himself "a fighting cricketer" said he wanted to play again in Australia.
"It wasn't that everyone hated me," he said. "Whenever I went out, people would come and meet me." So that's how our summer of tumult ends. With Harbhajan Singh as the voice of reason.
Today's Herald Sun:
Harbhajan blasts Hayden, Gilchrist as rift widens
CONTROVERSIAL spinner Harbhajan Singh has further deepened the animosity between India and Australia, calling Matthew Hayden "a big liar" and Adam Gilchrist "no saint"...
Harbhajan said he was upset when Hayden and wicketkeeper-batsman Gilchrist both supported Symonds in the racial row.
"Don't talk about Hayden's credibility, he is a big liar," Harbhajan told the Delhi-based tabloid Mail Today.
"He (Gilchrist) is also not a saint. He, of course, pretends to be a saint - someone who doesn't say an offensive word on the field.
"But this is completely wrong. There are times when he doesn't let an opportunity go (to) waste," Harbhajan said, adding Gilchrist said nasty things on the field.
Next: A flat denial or extreme dudgeon at being so wickedly taken out of context, followed by a BCCI announcement that there's no case to answer.
DENIAL #
It's a denial; at least according to the India Times:
Harbhajan denies remarks against Aussie players
JALANDHAR, March 7: India's ace spinner Harbhajan Singh on Friday denied having called Australian opener Matthew Hayden a 'big liar' and wicketkeeper-batsman Adam Gilchrist 'no saint'.
Harbhajan, who was at the centre of most of the controversies during the acrimonious tour of Australia, was quoted by a daily as saying "Don't talk about Hayden's credibility, he is a big liar".
The spinner, however, made it clear that he had not made such comments.
"I did not make these comments. A lot has been written in the last few days, but I have not said such things", Harbhajan said.
SPOKH TOO LATE #
Stakeholders Sutherland shuts the gate after the dolt has bolted:
Discipline Harbhajan: Australians
CRICKET Australia has finally abandoned diplomacy and demanded that India discipline Harbhajan Singh for his latest outburst after the spinner questioned the credibility of Matthew Hayden and the ethics of Adam Gilchrist.
Cricket Australia chief executive James Sutherland yesterday wrote to Indian board secretary Niranjan Singh expressing his exasperation.
"Enough is enough," Sutherland wrote. "Despite assurances that you have instructed him not to fuel this issue any more, Harbhajan continues to say whatever he wants. When will it ever end? Could you please deal with your player in regard to these comments."
Posted by Tony on Saturday, March 8, 2008 at 21:15 | Comments (14)
Category: Cricket (462)
WHAT BLANKET?
Just ban booze:
Not a fan of shameful crowd behaviour
SHAMEFUL cricket crowds and pathetic security have delivered a embarrassing blot on Australia, which is kidding itself if it thinks it does not have a serious problem on its hands.
Crowds here are now the ugliest in the world, and that is no small statement considering some of the behaviour from fans at Indian grounds.
Posted by Tony on Thursday, March 6, 2008 at 12:50 | Comments (19)
Category: Cricket (462)
TOO VEXY
Greg Baum's article today is too hard on Straya, but as a summary of the summer - An Indian Summary - it's worth a look.
Out with the old, in with the new
THE last unedifying kerfuffle of a vexatious summer obscured the enduring message to emerge from it. You might even argue, looking at yesterday's front page, that it fell between the cracks.
Posted by Tony on Thursday, March 6, 2008 at 10:45 | Comments (1)
Category: Cricket (462)
SYMONDS HITS THE FAN
Posted by Tony on Wednesday, March 5, 2008 at 08:25 | Comments (9)
Category: Cricket (462)
THE CANTONATOR
Monkey acts and spitting were not enough. After being taunted by yobbos, Rollerboy should have kicked a member of the crowd.
Discuss.
Posted by Tony on Monday, March 3, 2008 at 17:15 | Comments (60)
Category: Cricket (462)
THE BATTIFICATION OF ST MATTHEW
Homer links to Rebecca Wilson in the Sydney Telegraph:
Cricket Australia bow to bullies
WHEN we think of Australian sporting characters, opener Matthew Hayden is not exactly the man who immediately comes to mind.
Great batsman. Prolific run scorer. Good team man. But character? Hardly.
This week, Hayden knocked on the door and asked for entry into the hallowed hall where our great sporting characters reside.
Can I just mention that Homer runs the excellent Indian cricket blog: My Two Cents. Naturally, he's on the flip side of pretty much everything written here. But it's not just rabid Hindi - How's that for ya, Boo? - ranting. It's a tight blog written from the enemy... sorry, opposition perspective. Just beware the enormous links.
Anyhoo, Rebecca Wilson.
Most of her article is fine: instead of getting all high and mighty with Hayden, CricAussie should have pulled him aside for a quiet word in his shell-like; CA should stop sucking up; and the Indians are sooks and squealers. "Humourless as a box of hammers" is a nice mixed metaphor, too. But I agree with Homer that the bit about the castes was dopey, although I'm not sure why I think that. Maybe because it doesn't matter whether Rollerboy is rich, poor, a member of India's "burgeoning middle class" or even a real and actual intemperate Sikh warrior. It looks more like she chucked that in to give the article intellectual backbone. It doesn't. Nor was I aware a bully's favourite line is "Nobody likes you". Although, you really have to concede it contains an element of truth in regard to Hayden; he's not popular with the opposition.
Strangest, though, is her beatification of St Matthew the Character.
Reverend Flatty is a fantastic cricketer, but he ain't no saint. If he was he would have made a sacrifice. That's what Saint's do: stick to their guns then get executed. Flatty obviously didn't have to go that far, but he could have owned his statement that Rollerboy is "an obnoxious weed" because Rollerboy IS an obnoxious weed, and everyone knows it. But no. Flatty allowed CA to force him into an apology.
Not that it was much of an apology. Not that it was much of an offence; more one of time and place - discretion, if you like - than what was actually said. But it was your typical sporting apology: "I called him a cvnt, his mum a whore, his dad a faggot, his country a shithole... I didn't mean to hurt his feelings."
On second thoughts, maybe the sacrifice was to look like a goose on telly reading from a prepared statement.
Wouldn't it have been magnificent if, just once, a professional sportsman stood his digs and said "Hang on, this bloke is a fair dinkum dead shit. Barley Charley on your apology."
Posted by Tony on Saturday, March 1, 2008 at 22:05 | Comments (28)
Category: Cricket (462)
RIKKI TIKKI... TICKI... TICKING... TICKING...
What's Spanky on?
"Not the least tiresome aspect of this bitterness has been the way nationalistic backslappers in both countries have sided with their own players."
Piffle.
Posted by Tony on Friday, February 29, 2008 at 11:45 | Comments (39)
Category: Cricket (462)
ROAD TO SERFDUMB
And another thing. Can people - and by people I mean pinheads who prefer the sound of their own rhetoric - please stop droning on about the IPL player auction. "When I heard about the hideous indignities at the IPL slave market, I choked on my larks tongues." Just shut up. Since when did slaves have a choice? Since when were slaves given big money for their work? It's no slave market. There was no indignity. There was just a bunch of highly skilled, willing participants ready to accept a lot of wonga for their services in an open and transparent bidding system. Pity it doesn't spread to the AFL.
Mark has more:
There have been a series of predictably snarky comments, both on the crystal box and in the chip wrappers, about the amount of money cricketers will earn from the IPL.
Posted by Tony on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 12:43 | Comments (22)
Category: Cricket (462)
SOBADOB LITTLE WEED
All sooking, all dobbing. Who doesn't love this summer of sledge?
Matthew Hayden launches 'weed' spray of Harbhajan Singh
MATTHEW Hayden yesterday labelled Harbhajan Singh an "obnoxious little weed" as India was told to stop whingeing.
Hayden unleashed a stinging verbal attack on Harbhajan on the same day former Test firebrand Rodney Hogg demanded India stop moaning about trivial on-field clashes.
Hayden and Harbhajan locked horns at the SCG on Sunday, with Hayden yesterday claiming he had called the controversial Indian a "bad boy" rather than a "mad boy".
What's up with bad vs mad? Who cares? Why clarify? Rollerboy is both.
Posted by Tony on Wednesday, February 27, 2008 at 11:20 | Comments (21)
Category: Cricket (462)
PLEASE DON'T LET ME BE MISUNDERSTOOD

Biffed that picture from CricInfo; where, incidentally, there is no picture of Instant giving Sideshow a send-off.
KID GLOVES #
Instant was fined for that send off. Ponting and the rest of the Strayan team were fined for a slow over rate. But Dhoni Kebab got rock all despite blatant cheating:
IN A a bizarre aftermath to Sunday's spiteful limited-overs match in Sydney, Mahendra Singh Dhoni has escaped with a slap on the wrist, Ricky Ponting has been fined, Ishant Sharma has pleaded guilty to aggressive behaviour and Andrew Symonds has claimed he was simply congratulating the young paceman before their words became heated.
CRACKIN' THE MADS #
India are the biggest sooks of all time. Or are they? Yeah, of course they are. But not only do they spit the dummy, when it suits them, they also sell the dummy to manipulate match officials. If potting the Aussies for calling Rollerboy "mad boy" is not a rank attempt to divert heat from Kebab's gloves then I'm a maa kii's uncle:
Indians lodge complaint against Aussie 'bully boys'
TENSION between Australia and India exploded last night when the tourists lodged an official complaint against the alleged bully-boy tactics of Ricky Ponting, Matthew Hayden and Andrew Symonds.
CNUT CASE #
And anyway! What sort of soft blouser fieldsman goes squealing to the officials when they are sledged by the batsmen? Aussies would neve... oops.

Posted by Tony on Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 12:25 | Comments (13)
Category: Cricket (462)
WINDOW DRESSING
The idea for an annual Twenty20 fiesta in India has been defended by all and sundries as a necessary "window" for fitting the short caper into the international schedule. Spin. If the T20 in India is a raging success, you'd have to be a very thick thicko indeed not to be able to see that other countries will want their cut and eat it, too.
Can you imagine the phoodboll countries looking at the English Premier League and concluding that because the EPL is too good they may as well fold? Of course not. The EPL is probably the biggest phoodboll competition on the orb - at least from our anglicized perspective - but there are plenty of other strong La Leegas, Seeriah Ays, Boondessleegas, and Copper Del Mericas; even our own Ay Leeg is looking to increase its profile. Certainly none have shut up shop because the EPL is currently rocking.
Crash has a fair point in today's News papers: India are laughing because the T20 festivals will strengthen their own player development. But it's not an entirely valid point. Has the EPL made England the best soccer nation? No. Who doesn't love it when the red tops embark on their yearly slam-a-thon of hopeless England (Swedes 2 Turnips 1), the cheating opposition (Achtung!) or the blind ump... referees (Swiss Banker!). What the EPL does, apart from churn big money, is increase the depth of soccer ability world wide.
In the same way I'm not against the EPL being big business, I'm not against T20. I don't take much notice of the format, but nor do I take much notice of ice hockey, tennis, horse racing, golf, any motor racing format or large mouth bass fishing. I pretty much contain my interests to AFL, Test cricket, NFL and major league baseball, but all the rest merrily exist without any input from me.
And they are all professional. Just like T20 is now professional.
Someone needs to tell that to the papers; Saturday's headlines were particular gloat-fests. The Herald Sun: Another Poor Return. Aussies win but million dollar batsmen fail again.The Strayan: Money cannot buy runs. Bad Day at the office for cricket's new millionaires.
Perspective, please. The combined total of the T20 Aussie bids was $7.39 million. Tiger Woods can make that in a handful of tournaments. Roger Federer likewise. Same for good AND bad boxers, loads of phoodboll players, and pretty much everyone in the American baseball except for the kid who picks up the bats. You don't see the papers getting stuck into the likes of Woods, Federer, Tom Brady because the make big money.
Mind you, what you do see is the press getting stuck into players who fail to live up to their price tag, which I suppose is what Saturday's papers were doing. It will be interesting to see if the IPL signees live up to their auction value. Imagine if Dhoni Kebab strolls out and makes a string of ducks, drops sitters, or is caught cheating like he might have been yesterday with his cheaty gloves.
That's the "beauty" of professional sport: your reputation is on the line. That's why I love major league baseball. Watching a clutch pitcher or hitter perform when the heat is on goes to the very essence of competitive sport. The same goes for Michael Jordan. He was not a superstar because he could sink buckets with his eyes closed, he was a superstar because he could sink buckets with his eyes closed with half a second left in a big match and everyone in the opposition trying to stop him.
That will be one of the attractions of the T20. Will players deliver? The cricket, from a purist's perspective, will mostly be crap, but big money has cranked up the pressure. Who will crack first?
Which all leads me onto another thing: the bagging of Roy, Ponting and Flatty for their string of failures. How come none of the experts zero in on the conditions? Those three batsmen, and loads others around the cricket world have, for numerous years, been able to rock up to a match and swing through the line on straight and true decks. Straya's whole Fifty50 - Frankie Leach used that term on Offsiders yesterday; bet he reads the AGB - philosophy is to swing big. But this season they haven't been able to do so; most every deck has been two paced and difficult to score on. Of course batsmen used to loverly roads have struggled. Then what happened yesterday? The SCG served up a run feast on a true pitch. A pity. Which have been the better matches? The low scoring scraps or Sunday's run glut? I've already seen yesterday's match described as a thriller. Balls! High scoring matches that suit their commercial imperative might be good for CricAussie and Channel Nine, but not for me. It can only be a matter of time until Richie Benaud works a T20 match and says "You simply must bat out the full 20 overs."
Will I follow the IPL? Yes, but not strongly. I was conceived in Calcutta, so I will follow Kolkata. But that's about it.
Having said ALL that, the threat to Test cricket, by far the best sport in the world, is very real. Mark asks a valid question:
How long before a centrally contracted English player decides that the lure of half a million a year for three years from the IPL is a better deal that about 20% of that over a shorter period from the ECB?
On a related note, Jonathan Agnew in today's Observer says that KP is looking 'distracted'. I wonder why that is?!
Here's hoping Test cricket doesn't implode because players decided on cash before country.
More from Olly Reed at Aussie Cricket:
When Steve Waugh was trying to inspire his Aussie side to win in India, he christened the challenge the 'final frontier'. Now that saying is irrelevant. India has become the epicentre of the cricket world. For all the flack the BCCI cops you have to give them credit for the IPL. It's a great idea. It's the sought of thing we should be doing in Australia.
Posted by Tony on Monday, February 25, 2008 at 12:55 | Comments (16)
Category: Cricket (462)
WAITING FOR GOODOUGH
Act I.
The time: Half past 2007.
The place: India.
The scene: Sponsor's function.
An Indian heavy hitter sidles up to Sideshow Roy.
HH: "Excuse me, Mr Roy?"
Roy: "G'day, Heavy Hitter."
HH: "Are you having a good time?"
Roy: "Great. This party is a blast. But did you have to book Bing to sing?"
HH: "Sorry, he is big in India. Tell me: are you, by chance, related to Arundhati Roy?"
Roy: "Not even by marriage. Who is he, anyway?"
HH: "It does not matter. I will come to the point: you like to make big monkey... I mean, many gorillas?"
Roy: "Too right, mate. Just show me where, when and especially how much."
HH: "Twenty20. Here. Next year. April."
Roy: "Shit. Can't do it. We're playing the Pakis."
HH: "Do not worry about those bomb-happy Musslims."
Roy: "CricAussie will want me to tour."
HH: "There is way around them, too."
Roy: "How so?"
HH: "Pakistan is basket case, yes?"
Roy: "It is?"
HH: "Touring there dangerous, yes?"
Roy: "It is?"
HH: "Bomb. Happy. Just talk about how Pakistan is basket case."
Roy: "I'm with you now. Why didn't you say so? 'Pakistan. Basket case.' That kind of thing?"
HH: "That kind of thing."
Roy: "The ICC?"
HH: "The ICC?!? Ho ho ho... that is a good one."
Roy: "What?"
HH: "Never mind. Keep expressing doubts about Pakistan and leave the rest to us."
Roy: "Gotcha."
HH: "Edmund Roy?"
Roy: "..."
HH: "Did not think so."
Posted by Tony on Friday, February 22, 2008 at 09:05 | Comments (9)
Category: Cricket (462)
MONKEY DO, MONKEY DO
Who said Test cricketers weren't role models?
Joe Amad doesn't possess a baggy green cap or even play for Victoria, but he proved last weekend that he is, dare we say, no ordinary Joe. You see, playing for his team Yarraleen against Templestowe, the Box Hill Reporter B2-grade competition's top team, the 39-year-old taxi driver came to the wicket with his side struggling at 5-29 but what then followed will be talked about at his club for years. After being dropped at five and 30, Amad told his batting partner: "I think this might be my day." He wasn't wrong. Not only did he proceed to plunder the bowling to the tune of 319 runs, eclipsing his own club record of 199, scored a couple of years ago, but when he was finally dismissed (caught in the deep by one of three fieldsmen within a 30-metre arc from deep mid-off to deep mid-on), he had struck 45 fours and five sixes and taken his team to 463, the third-highest total in the history of the club.
Posted by Tony on Thursday, February 21, 2008 at 12:45 | Comments (8)
Category: Cricket (462)
DAY-NIGHT STALKER
I have something in common with John Harms. No. Not Geelong. No. Not Queensland. No. Not short sentences. No. This:
The first time I ever stayed up for the entire night was watching the World Cup final from Lords in 1975.
Me, too. Watched it at my grandparents house in Mount Eliza, on a weekend away from boarding school. I still count that final as among the best one-day matches I've seen. Dunno about the decadent, but there was action alright: Lloyd and the Tavern window, Richards and the run outs, the calypso music, Thommo & Lillee batting at the end, Bill Lawry declaring with Marsh on 93. Ok, Marsh was 92. And it was a Test match. In Melbourne. Four years earlier. Anyway. Half way through the telecast I flipped to The Night Stalker, which despite being completely daggy, is still in my top ten all-time favourite TV shows. The way Kolchak went alone into derelict buildings, sewers, basements, attics and hidden underground cities is still in my top ten all-time how to create tension techniques. His blue suit and sand shoes is still in my top ten all-time fashion statements. And the show's theme is still in my top two all-time TV themes.
With this theme:
The theme to Dexter reminds me of John Barry.
Posted by Tony on Monday, February 18, 2008 at 14:40 | Comments (10)
Category: Cricket (462) , Television (69)
EVERYONE LOVES TT
Greg Baum used... sarcasm:
Whatever else it is, TT is not cricket
Everyone loves TT, but remember basketball, the last sport that tarted itself up.
EVERYONE loves Twenty20 (TT for short — evidently an abbreviated game needs an even more abbreviated name). Fans love it for the atmos, the novelty, the fireworks, the din. Television loves it for the ratings. Administrators love it because television loves it. Players love it for the money — fistfuls of it.
When I saw the heading to Patrick Smith's article in yesterday's Strayan I thought he meant the speed and intensity of TT would eat up the fogey cricketers who were trying to eke out a few extra seasons worth of cashola:
Revolution will devour old fogeys
WHEN cricket was turned on its head by the World Series revolution there was some sympathy for administrators.
They might have been naive or arrogant not to be prepared for the devastation that Kerry Packer's breakaway league would deliver, but it was their trusted senior players who plotted in secret against them. They were betrayed from within.
Well... not everyone loves TT:
Greed, hypocrisy and forgotten fans
TWO months ago this column said loudly that the Australian cricket community needed to coalesce into a house of review and ensure that Cricket Australia is acting in the best interests of its constituents.
The need is greater than ever. In December the call to arms was, among other things, triggered by talk of Test match cricket being played under lights. Now it has more to do with preserving the integrity, uniqueness and relevance of Test match cricket per se.
Posted by Tony on Sunday, February 17, 2008 at 13:50 | Comments (23)
Category: Cricket (462)
CIRCLE THE WAGONS!
Sorry, wrong injuns:
FORMER leading umpire Robin Bailhache believes umpires have been placed under intolerable pressure following India's successful push to sack Steve Bucknor after a poor second Test in Sydney last month.
While Bailhache did not directly blame the need to please India for two poor decisions struggling South African umpire Rudi Koertzen made against Australia in last Sunday's one-day loss, he said umpires were now "under notice" if things went against India.
Posted by Tony on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 at 12:35 | Comments (10)
Category: Cricket (462)
I ME MINEFIELD
Correct:
Most people don’t like one dayers when the bowlers dictate.
But most people are idiots.
My perfect one day game would be one team making 184, and the other making 183 and Inzy getting run out.
That 800 run match in Sorth Efrica? Stick it up your veldt. One of the best things about this season's summer of Benaud is the variable tracks on offer. Melbourne and Perth were both better Tests because the pitches were difficult. Melbourne, low and slow for the Test, is now hard and bouncy for the one dayers; Perth, a speed merchant's paradise for the Quicket, is overnight transformed into a slowish seam dream for the Test.
At the risk of saying "We've been saying it here for years", "We've been sayi... dodgy tracks rock. It's hard to believe that Kevin Bartlett and Crash Craddock only just discovered the wonders of shit pitches, but that's the way they were carrying on today. Same for Tubby last night. Naturally it goes against the commercial imperative to risk a shortened telecast with difficult batting conditions, but there's no doubt matches are better when batting is not better. The best way to guarantee a good match in a one dayer is to juice up the pitch. Remember the 2003 World Cup? The two best matches were Straya v. England and Straya v. New Zealand, both at Port Elizabeth and both on awkward decks. And of course there was Sorth Efrica's farcical Duckyloo calculations for extra entertainment. These matches should be the template for the future of Fifty50 cricket.
Posted by Tony on Monday, February 11, 2008 at 12:35 | Comments (12)
Category: Cricket (462)
LAME DUCK
A phusics lisson from Richard Boock:
You've got to give it to Sir Isaac Newton. He really knew what he was on about with that third law thing you know, the one about every action attracting an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, life has consequences; what goes around comes around, and by definition I guess you reap what you sow.
By the way. Sorry I haven't been able to reply to the comments, but I've got a full timetable this week. As Dick Boock would say: "Flat out like a Beirut lizard layer."
Posted by Tony on Wednesday, February 6, 2008 at 08:25 | Comments (3)
Category: Cricket (462)
CATCH SCRATCH FEVER
That heading doesn't make any sense. Anyway... you reckon the AGB is setting the agenda?
First we drive Gilly into retirement:
Wee Wee wouldn't have got to 100 if Gilly had his sh1t together. After performances like yesterday, he's running the risk of being compared with The Grates: Party Patel, Geraint Jones and the down-and-going (as opposed to up-and-coming) Matt Prior. Lucky Wee Wee didn't make 200 or you'd be comparing Gilly to Courtney Browne who once dropped a sitter off Steve Waugh, or the bloke who dropped Brian Lara when Lara made 500.
Gilly is at an awkward stage of his career. Apparently he wants to go to England in 2009, but is that feasible? Well, if he scores big in the near future, and doesn't drop any more sitters (don't bank on it) he'll hold his place. But at 36 going on 38 by 2009 he isn't getting any younger, or more importantly, better.
The selectors need to ask themselves whether Gilly will be better in 2009 than, say, Brad Haddin? That's unlikely, both for batting and keeping. Gilly's career path is on the way down, while Braddin's is on the way up. Have those career trajectories crossed yet? I suggest they have. They certainly will have by 2009.
There is nothing worse - apart from lots of other bad things in the world: drought, flood, bushfire, Silverchair - than sports people hanging on too long. Does Gilly want to hang on too long? Will the selectors allow him to hang on too long? He has a few credits in the bank, although he cashed a few in yesterday, but not that many that the selectors can afford to have him clogging up the chain of succession. At some point soon they will have to make the big call: "Mate, we need to have a chat."
Unless Gilly the famous walker, walks.
Then there was this:
Did you know our drops against India in the Tests cost us 569 runs?
Now Peter Lalor - who is starring lately - takes up the cause:
THE standard of fielding is said to be one of the barometers of a player or a team in decline. Michael Hussey
If it is true, Australia's dominance is slipping away at an alarming rate.
Posted by Tony on Tuesday, February 5, 2008 at 12:45 | Comments (8)
Category: Cricket (462)
THE REVISIONABLES
Spanky is right that The Invincibles were helped by Pomgolian cricket being blitzed by WWII. The same happened when the Big Ship whitewashed England 5-0 in 1920/21 after WWI.
For your consideration:
Time for the Governor-General to walk LAST Tuesday night in Canberra, His Excellency, the Governor-General, Michael Jeffrey got to his feet, clinked a sherry glass with a steak knife and proceeded to wag his finger at the Australian Cricket Team. | Waugh was better than Bradman: fact WE'VE all spent happy summer hours grumbling about the stuffy old men's club that tries to control cricket. Take banning the wave. Or mid-strength beer. But I have a bigger problem to fix. |
|---|
When someone says to you "I remember when" do you automatically look it up? And how often is someone's memory someone's else's memory?
Posted by Tony on Tuesday, February 5, 2008 at 08:25 | Comments (8)
Category: Cricket (462)
RANK FEST
Can never work out the cricket rankings. Aren't we World Champions until 2011? And aren't Sorth Efrica always "closing in on No.1"? Someone crunch the numbers please.
AUSTRALIA has been put on notice that its status as one-day world champion is under threat this summer.
Despite claiming the past three World Cups and losing just two of its past 21 one-day internationals, Australia is on the brink of being dethroned.
It would be like Tiger Woods losing his No. 1 ranking despite dominating world golf over the past five years.
But, a rampaging South African side, who have won their series against the West Indies 5-0, have moved to within four rankings points of Australia.
Australia needs to make the final of the tri-series against India and Sri Lanka to maintain top spot -- and even that may not be enough.
To guarantee its hold on the top ranking, Ricky Ponting's men will have to win the one-day final series.
Spelling Mistake: There's no rampage needed to beat Tori Spelling.
Posted by Tony on Monday, February 4, 2008 at 17:20 | Comments (13)
Category: Cricket (462)
AD GLIB
Add your glib Western responses:
Calm should not be mistaken for peace
IT is time to have another crack at the glib Western response to the Harbhajan affair. The debate has become altogether too cosy. Several points need to be made. Yes, a lot of skin creams are sold in India. Yes, every ad in Indian magazines seems to feature light-skinned youths. Yes, India has its castes and colours. It is imperfect. But it has also had in recent years a Sikh president, a Muslim prime minister and a white, female, Catholic divorcee leading its main political party. Other nations should be as lucky.
Posted by Tony on Monday, February 4, 2008 at 08:25 | Comments (14)
Category: Cricket (462)
SCAMORABILIA
A long overdue article on the sh1t flogged by the Nine commentators:
CHANNEL Nine has been flogging the stuff for years. In the Sydney Test, it was Andrew Symonds’ turn. A "beautifully presented, personally signed" photo of Symonds, on bent knee after a belted drive, and underneath an actual swatch of willow from a bat used by Symonds in a 2007 Test match, complete with his year’s statistics, all finished in "a quality timber frame".
Titled A Smashing Year, this limited-edition "amazing collectable" of 250 pieces is officially licensed by Cricket Australia, authenticated and certified by Pricewaterhouse Coopers, and two weeks ago, you could have it for just $728. Yesterday, its price was down to $693.
Only problem is, according to sports memorabilia expert Rick Milne, they’re worth next to nothing. Because by next year no one wants to buy them.
"At the Perth Test two weeks ago, Richie Benaud stooped so low as to be flogging some Adam Gilchrist tribute," Milne said last week. "I don’t think it’s a good look for somebody like Richie Benaud to be flogging that stuff, and there he was, saying, ‘Great memories of the brilliance of Adam Gilchrist, just call this number’. But the things on the secondary market are almost worthless."
Posted by Tony on Sunday, February 3, 2008 at 13:15 | Comments (47)
Category: Cricket (462)
CATCH 20/20
Been thinking. Everyone – you know, everyone – has been saying that Twenty20 will be best served by being restricted to only one or two matches per summer. Trouble is, if we only have one or two matches, what’s the point?
See where I’m coming from?
If a match is not a part of a larger competition it becomes a novelty or a gimmick or a gigantic “retail opportunity,” as Martin Brundle once referred to an ad break in the Melbourne Grand Prix.
Then if there are too many matches, Twenty20 runs the risk of losing credibility in the same way Fifty50 has lost credibility with all its meaningless matches.
So how’s it going to fit in?
Well, if we take last night’s match as an example we would conclude from a purely cricket perspective that it’s not going to fit in very well at all. A crap match was all over 15 minutes after it started. But from a financial perspective we would conclude it’s going to fit in very nicely indeed, thank you very much, you’re welcome, don’t mention it. We could even extrapolate from the second perspective that the other Strayan states will start fretting that all international Twenty20 matches will end up at the MCG given it is the home of Strayan cricket, the people’s ground, the paddock that grew, and most significantly, holds more than twice as many cash cows and stakeholde… paying customers as any cricket venue in this wide brown land of sunburn.
Twenty20 is also still in a state of “so what”. Say what? Well, Straya won and Captain Nemo was “speechless” at how well Straya played, while India lost and Dhoni Kebab shrugged it off as only a “practice game”. Surely if it’s just a practice game, losing doesn’t matter and if losing doesn’t matter, the match is meaningless.
That said, I’ve been saying for years that Straya treat the Benson & Hedges, Fosters, Carlton, VB, CB Series as a round of practice matches for the Fifty50 World Cup. Actually, they probably were not doing that as far back as the B&H days, but they have certainly been doing it since they lost the 1996 World Cup. Anyhoo, it is conceivable there is something in what Kebab says: India could well have treated last night as a praccy. Fifty50’s lost lustre is often attributed to the many matches being used to trial players and tactics for the World Cup. Who’s to say Twenty20 won’t go the same way. It certainly will if Kebab & Co treat the matches as trial games.
Not that Kebab downplayed the nature of India’s victory in the ICC World Twenty20. Nor did they suggest they hadn’t earned the cars and homes they were given when they got back to India. Yet THAT was a practice run for the first Twenty20 World Cup.
Regular AGB readers would not be confused, but just in case you wandered in here by mistake from the wilds of newspapers or talk radio - last September’s ICC World Twenty20 was not the Twenty20 World Cup. So stop saying India are the Twenty20 World Cup champions.
One thing in particular I want to mention from last night is the fielding. Before I turned over to The Murder Room on ABC at 8:30, the commentators couldn’t stop raving about the Aussie fielding. (When they weren’t drooling over the size of the crowd.) Fair enough, the Strayan fielding was superb. But until it translates into catching in the Tests I’ll reserve my judgment as to whether Twenty20 is a good influence on Test cricket. I’d much rather we took our catches in the Tests than save a few runs in the field with dynamic dives.
Speaking of catching, Mark has a good piece on the influence of the keeper:
Gil Christ Superstar!
A lot of commentators have made the very valid point about Adam Gilchrist, in that he revolutionised the way test sides now view their wicketkeeping position.
Last word on last night: Nemo’s captaincy. Can’t say if it was good or bad based on one viewing, but he certainly looked the part jumping here and there, looking serious, fielding like a demon, batting well and being named man of the match. At one point I had a chuckle when he whistled and flicked his fingers to move a fielder in the deep. Bet there’s someone out there whose delicate sensibilities are ready to be offended. There’s probably also a working dog somewhere who “got in behind”.
Posted by Tony on Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 15:25 | Comments (11)
Category: Cricket (462) , India 2007/08 (6)
SPANKEE
Here.
What am I doing? Not sure. I want to keep all the Test Match posts and comments in one place. Boynton mentioned something about "the nature of blogging" and "readers might miss your updates" and how I needed to better identify new Test Match posts. And Peter M. emailed about RSS.
Posted by Tony on Thursday, January 31, 2008 at 15:25 |
Category: Cricket (462) , India 2007/08 (6)
FOURTH TEST: BARREL OF MONKEYS
- Preview
- Fruit Cake
- The Sport of Rings
- The Midwinter Draft
- Day One
- Down Syndrome
- Day Two
- The Writing's On The Ball
- Casualties of Lore
- Day Three
- Goad Warrior
- Day Four
- Roll Player
- Day Five
- Spin Shitty
- Bucken Dickhead
- Tired and Demotional
- Protest Match Special
- Blubble Standards
- Spankee
PREVIEW #
Snowtown barrel, that is. And welcome to Adelaide, Michael C. Hall of teevee's Six Feet Under.
So, India will have the same side, give or take a spinner and an opener. Straya will have the same side, give or take a spinner and an opener. The difference being that the changes might unbalance India whereas they should re-balance Straya. Still:
- Straya $1.85
- Draw $2.50
- India $7.00
The bookies obviously don't take bets from India. Those odds seem rudely weighted towards the home team. Sure, Perth will be a huge spur for Straya and they will have their selections and pitch awareness sorted. And I'm positive they won't let India win by bowling part-timers to pick up a mishandled over rate. Still can't get my head around that. Again: to protect Ponting from suspension Straya let India win. Bizarre. If that happens again I will agree with Spanky: Ponting must be sacked. But while I see Straya playing better, India are enormous confidence players and front runners, so Perth should be a huge fillip for them.
Either way, SACA pitch doctor Lally Burdett should serve up another belter with a garnish of day five action. So I just hope Straya shelve the stupid and grind out some big runs, because India will like batting here, too. Straya can't afford any Agarkar dumbness like day four in 2003.
FRUIT CAKE #
Speaking of Spanky, he's taking the piss, right?
Recalls, retirements to add extra spank
AUSTRALIA must not be waylaid by nauseating nationalists convinced that the defeat in Perth was caused not by a combination of absent friends and wayward bowling but by a sudden bout of politeness. Nor must it take heed of backslappers arguing that India's celebrations and appealing at the WACA Ground matched Australia's excesses in Sydney.
That is to confuse joy with rage. Likewise, the umpiring was acceptable and even-handed. Only lamingtons imagine otherwise.
Funny how most of his sh1t-stirring occurs in the privacy of his own boudoir. Surely, he'd be reluctant to be so flagrantly antagonistic in the commentary box.
THE SPORT OF RINGS #
Nothing to do with cricket. Not even current. Connolly and Bruckner in a cage match over the Olympic games:
Clock ticks down to fortnight of turgid TV DON'T you love those countdowns to big events we newspapers run. You know the sort. This many days until the NAB Cup ⦠that many days until the AFL premiership season ⦠and, my personal favourite, a truck-load of days until the next Olympic Games. | 220 days until the Olympics and millions who care TWO hundred and twenty days to go until the Beijing Olympics and, unlike my esteemed colleague Rohan Connolly in this column yesterday, I can't wait. Having the greatest sporting event in the world only once every four years just makes the anticipation all the more exciting. |
|---|
THE MIDWINTER DRAFT #
Scyld Berry says England should load up on spinners and prepare dodgy wickets for next year's Ashes. He also suggests England should draft in Bowled Sacky Sacky Bowled Mushtaq.
India's success gives England hope for Ashes
In planning their strategy for 2009, England need to think about slow, turning pitches, negating Australia's advantage in pure pace and playing to their own strengths of swing and left-arm spin. If Panesar needs a second spinner, the possibilities are Graeme Swann, maturing as England's first-choice spinner in one-day cricket, or Saqlain Mushtaq, Pakistan's off-spinner who has become a naturalised British citizen and offered his services to England. But that would depend on the lengths that England's new selection panel are ready to go to in pursuit of the Ashes.
Why should England be the only country to "benefit" from bringing in players from other countries? Sure, we had Keppler Wessels, but I didn't want him. And England have picked Basil Dolly, Alan Lamb, Robin Smith, Kevin Pietersen, Tony Greig, Andy Caddick, Marty McCague, Graeme Hick, Alan Mullaly, Gerain... anyway, you get the picture.
Charlie Croker: "I've got a great idea."
Whenever a player who has played first class cricket in one country wants to play for another country, he must enter a draft in which he must go to the bottom team on the ICC Test Ladder. For instance, KP should have gone to Bangladesh. If a player wants to leave the bottom side, he must go to the next one up the ladder.
This draft will be called the Midwinter Draft in honour of Billy Midwinter who played for both England and Australia from 1877 to 1887.
DAY ONE #
Just one more wicket. Just. One. More. Wicket. That was all it would have taken for Straya to claim the upper hand on day one. But thanks to Flatty's bumbled sitter off Dhoni late in the day, India can claim day one honours. Gilly's shocker was contributive, too. In one respect it allowed Laxman further time at the wicket, sucking Strayan momentum; and in another more general respect, dropped catches eat at the fielding side. And its supporters: f*^k! It's a testament to Strayan professionalism that they rarely let drops affect their performance; they just cost.
India 5/300? Well, that looks about par for a first day in Adelaide, but it could be better than it seems. If India knock up what everyone seems to think is a respectable Adelaide score of 400+ then Straya will be under some real pressure given their troubles with both the swinging AND spinning ball. India has a much more potent and varied attack than many touring predecessors. Now their clever use of Irfy at the top of the order means they have an attack of five bowlers, all who have been handy-to-excellent at different times in this series, so they present a major threat when Straya bat.
And with TLM and Dhoni Kebab still at the wicket, 400 will be the very least India are aiming for.
So it will be up to the Aussie bowlers to try to cut through the last five Indian wickets. Here's hoping the excellent Lee, the almost excellent Johnston and the weirdly under-bowled Clark can do the business. Hogg, too. The Tongue went for plenty off TLM yesterday, but oddly enough, I reckon he bowled alright. Strayans might pine for the Warne days, but even Warne struggled against India; they eat spinners.
Should I comment on the umpiring? Well, alright then. They seem to be playing a numbers game on elbees. Ganguly was stiff, although I can see why he was given out. I read somewhere that he hit it, but on the replay last night, the ball clearly hit his pad before it flicked his glove. Still, if the Raj was out, then so too were V-Slog, Wall and TLM.
For the record: It is theoretically easier for an umpire to judge an elbee when the ball hits the batsman on the crease because the umpy has a better idea of where the ball is going in relation to the stumps.
DOWN SYNDROME #
The very last line of this article by Sambit Bal says it all:
"This is not the first time India have out-caught Australia."
Permit me direct to you to a post I wrote in January 2004:
DROPPING IS CATCHING
After watching Stewart MacGill in klutz overdrive, this might be the right time to link to an article in today's Telegraph on Australia's catching woes:
MAYBE it's just bad luck. Maybe it's because Australia have remodelled their slips cordon. Maybe it's just the pressure. Whatever the reason Australia have succumbed to a rare dose of butter fingers in their Test series against India and it is threatening to prove decisive.
What the online article doesn't contain is the following chart:
BRISBANE
Martyn....Sehwag....16 (45)
MacGill....Ganguly....103 (144)ADELAIDE
Ponting....Laxman....65, 138 ( 148)
Gilchrist....Dravid....9 (72)
Ponting....Dravid....20(72)MELBOURNE
Katich....Sehwag....66 (195)
Langer....Sehwag....73 (195)
Lee....Ganguly....9 (37)
Gilchrist....Agarkar....0 (0)
Gilchrist....Tendulkar....12 (44)SYDNEY
Katich....Chopra....8 (45)
MacGill....Tendulkar....149 (220)
MacGill....Laxman....172 (178)The last two were added by me after today's clown fest.
No matter the reason - lack of practice, bad technique, pressure, injury, suspension, luck - the article reveals a poor record that seems to tie in with Scott Wickstein's observation that John Buchanan might be doing something wrong because the article goes on to say:
The Australian team does not train as hard as it used to but this may not necessarily correlate to poor infield catching.
But it may.
I'm of the opinion that over the last few years of dominance, Australia has taken it's catches whereas the opposition have dropped theirs.
When it comes to costly misses, I always think back to Steve Waugh in the West Indies in 1995. As we all know he made 200 in the decisive test, but what's often forgotten is that he was dropped an absolute sitter by keeper Courtney Browne (he was about 40). At that stage Australia were three down and still trailing and it's debatable whether they would have managed a big enough lead to snatch the series.
On the flip side, in recent losses Australia have dropped a bundle in Sydney against England, Martin Love dropped a sitter in slips off Omari Banks in the West Indies record chase and now against India, Australia have been nigh on inept.
It shouldn't be forgotten that Rahul Dravid took a blinder to get rid of Martyn in Adelaide. The kind of catch that can - and in this case has - gone a long way to decide a series.
Australia's attack will weaken over the next few years and the team will struggle with the increased pressure inferred by the expectation of fewer chances. This means that they must firstly remember that "catches win matches" but more importantly that "dropped catches LOSE matches". And do something about it!
With respect to Wicky's comment above, here's Bruce yesterday with a paved paradise, a parking lot, a pink hotel, a boutique and a swinging hot spot.
I am adding to my push for Brazen Hussey to be introduced with a call for the return of Bobby Simpson as the fielding drills coach. Sure this baseball fella has them cutting off balls better and throwing harder with more accuracy - but I don't think there is a baseball equivalent of the cordon.
Part of the bad old days malady was the dismal slips catching that followed the retirement of Greg Chappell. Then Bobby flogged AB, Tubby, Junior and others until they became as close to the backyard cricket automatic wicky as I may ever see in my life.
*strains of Big yellow taxi should accompany that last part*
Straya certainly have to do something. It seems to me nothing has changed since 2004. Don't forget they put down some costly howlers in the 2005 Ashes. In fact, Strayan catching has been deplorable for pretty much the whole 21st century.
Anyway, on to this series. Now might be the time to avert your eyes. Or in the words of a newsreader about to read a footy score: "If you don't want to relive the pain, look away now."
First Test: First Innings
7.1 Johnson to Dravid, no run, dropped, the batsman pushing forward away from his body and a thick edge flies low and hard to Jaques at fourth slip who can't hang on with his right hand. Dravid on 0, made 5 (5)
Second Test: First Innings
18.6 Clark to Laxman, FOUR, dropped, Laxman tries to pull a short ball down leg side and gets an edge on it, the ball flies towards Gilchrist's left, he dives and gets a bit of glove on it but the ball beats him and runs to the fine-leg boundary, it would have been a spectacular catch. Laxman on 49, made 109 (60)
24.4 Clark to Dravid, no run, did Gilchrist drop that? Dravid jumped back and tried to glance a slow short ball down leg side, he might have got a bit of glove on it but Gilchrist didn't collect a simple chance, it did come off the glove Dravid on 18, made 53 (35)
30.6 Lee to Laxman, 1 run, dropped, Gilchrist has put down another one, a genuine nick low to his right and the batsman gets a life, Lee will be disappointed after finding the edge from a press forward Laxman on 77, made 109 (32)
102.3 Clark to Harbhajan Singh, 1 run, dropped, Gilchrist lets another one go, Harbhajan tried to pull another short ball, the ball lobbed in the air towards Gilchrist who pedaled backwards and got both gloves to it, he still couldn't hold on Harbhajan on 29, made 63 (34)
Second Test: Second Innings
14.2 Johnson to Dravid, no run, dropped, Symonds grasses a sitter at first slip, Johnson hit the perfect length and line across the right-hander, Dravid was squared up on the back foot as he fended at the ball, the outside edge flew comfortably to Symonds who is at first slip because Hayden is injured, the ball popped in and popped right out Dravid on 18, made 38 (20)
35.1 Symonds to Ganguly, no run, dropped, Michael Clarke at first slip, that one just flew to his left, but was a genuine chance Ganguly on 43, made 51 (8)
Third Test: First Innings
27.2 Lee to Dravid, no run, oh Clarke's dropped it! Dravid goes fishing way outside off stump, gets a thick outside edge, very late into the shot as the ball comes onto him quickly, but Pup drops it at first slip, squeezing at it as he moves to his left and spills a sitter! Dravid on 7, made 93 (86)
Third Test: Second Innings
16.5 Lee to Sehwag, no run, dropped! Regulation gully catch as Sehwag flashes a driven edge off a wideish one, and the usually reliable Michael Hussey crouches to catch, but spills it Sehwag on 43, made 43 (0)
69.5 Lee to Laxman, 1 run, oh Clarke's dropped another! Laxman flashes a square-drive, having a real go at a wide half-volley, and Clarke cant hold on above his head at gully, jumping and getting fingers on it but letting it go Laxman on 60, made 79 (19)
Fourth Test: First Innings
63.3 Lee to Laxman, no run, Gilchrist drops a sitter! Laxman poked his bat out at one outside the off stump and a healthy edge flew through at a comfortable height for Gilchrist who moved to his right to take the catch, it popped in and popped right out, Hayden looks bewildered at first slip, the crowd lets out a loud groan Laxman on 37, made 51 (14)
80.6 Johnson to Dhoni, 2 runs, now Hayden drops a sitter! Dhoni drives hard at one that angles into him and gets an outside edge that flies at a very comfortable height to Hayden at first slip, he can't believe he's dropped it himself, it dipped on him at the last minute and he only got fingertips to it Dhoni on 3, made 16 (13)
96.4 Lee to Kumble, no run, dropped, Kumble gets an inside
edge on to the thigh pad as he tries to defend off the back foot, the ball goes quickly towards Jaques at short leg and goes straight through his handsKumble on 7, made 87 (80)
136.5 Clarke to Sharma, no run, dropped again! Clarke bowled the loosest full toss which Ishant patted back tamely at head height towards the bowler, Clarke got his hands up in time but grassed a sitter, Ponting is not amused Sharma on 4, made 14 (10)
141.6 Lee to Sharma, no run, dropped but it was a difficult chance, Ishant pushes at the ball away from his body and the outside edge flies to Ponting's right at second slip, he dives full length and low to his right but can't hold on, on a better day it might have stuck, fantastic effort Sharma on 10, made 14 (4)
150.5 Johnson to Sharma, no run, dropped, but another difficult chance, Ishant drives hard and away from his body, the outside edge flies quickly to Hussey who jumps up and gets both hands to it, he can't hold on and the ball runs towards third man Sharma on 14, made 14 (0)
Fourth Test: Second Innings
2.2 Lee to Sehwag, no run, dropped, Sehwag slashes away from his body at a wide ball and hits it with the toe end of the bat, the edge flies straight to Clarke at second slip, it's a sitter and he grasses it, it came right at him at a comfortable height too. Sehwag on 2, made 151 (149)
Far as I can remember, the only catch India have missed in this series is TLM dropping Clarke in Perth. And yet, here we are, once again boasting about how great our fielding is compared with the dreadful Indian fielding. Excuse me while I have a momentary tantrum: BOLLOX!
It's almost got to the point where we should dump our fielding drills and have round-the-clock catching practice. Or maybe there is a wider, yet seemingly absurd implication: India have it right for Test cricket. It could be that our fielding is now so heavily geared to the one-day format with the running and the diving and the sliding and the throwing, BUT with the expectation something is always about to happen, that we have neglected to work on our Test match waiting game where you need to take a chance out of the blue.
DAY TWO #
Our catching was rubbish, a lot of our bowling innocuous our tactics inflexible and the India tail wagged, but you know what? Apart from the catching, which really, really, REALLY! makes me fume, I'm not upset. After all, we've retained the BG trophy, which is something I thought we'd struggle to do at the start of the tour. If the honchos had scheduled India a few lead up games, like Kumble reportedly asked for, we probably would have lost the series. Sucked in, BCCI.
Nor would it be just me who is sitting sanguine. I'll give it London to a brick there are heavy-hitters in CricAussie who doubted our ability to hold onto the BG. Why? Well, because of the obvious retirements, that's why.
We are smack bang in the guts of a rebuilding phase and here is seriously depleted Straya, missing guns and trialling up-and-comers, still capable of matching it with a very good India containing Tendulkar, Kumble, Dravid, Laxman and Ganguly.
And therein lies an all too often ignored fact: India are about to cop it in the arse from retirements, too.
Parolerboy, only playing by the grace of the judiciary, is in the papers today boasting about how good India are, how "no team has challenged the way we have challenged Strayans" and skyting about how they are world champions because they won the T20 World Cup even though it wasn't the world cup, and yet they are also about to lose their greats.
Enjoy the rebuilding, pal.
I mean, how good will India be without those five champions? And even here in Adelaide, if Straya had held their catches, India's very strong batting line up would have been out for under 400 on a road.
Sure, India have got a billion people ready to step into their retiring champions shoes, or so we are repeatedly told, but you don't readily replace the kind of experience they are about to lose. What's good for the mallard is good for the muscovy. If Straya are currently doing it tough without Warne and McGrath, how good will India will without their champs?
Who would you back to get their actor together quicker? Crazy India and their bizarre structure that is just as likely to wreck a player's career as it is to develop a potential champ, or Machine Straya and their robust club, state, Test pathway.
THE WRITINGâS ON THE BALL #
And I don't mean Kookaburra, A.G.Thompson, approved, 156g, solid hi... ahem.
It means I agree with Nick. It was ordinary the way Gilly laughed off his bumbling. Maybe that's what's wrong with the Strayan catching: they are too busy laughing and f**king around on the field and not busy enough concentrating on the business of catching.
And just by way of supposition. Are the Strayan catching problems down to Gilly? I mean, does the keeper set the tone? Could it be Gilly's Party Patel imitations are rubbing off?
Anyhoo, just by way of getting-the-first-one-in, two weeks ago here at the AGB:
Wee Wee wouldn't have got to 100 if Gilly had his sh1t together. After performances like yesterday, he's running the risk of being compared with The Grates: Party Patel, Geraint Jones and the down-and-going (as opposed to up-and-coming) Matt Prior. Lucky Wee Wee didn't make 200 or you'd be comparing Gilly to Courtney Browne who once dropped a sitter off Steve Waugh, or the bloke who dropped Brian Lara when Lara made 500.
Gilly is at an awkward stage of his career. Apparently he wants to go to England in 2009, but is that feasible? Well, if he scores big in the near future, and doesn't drop any more sitters (don't bank on it) he'll hold his place. But at 36 going on 38 by 2009 he isn't getting any younger, or more importantly, better.
The selectors need to ask themselves whether Gilly will be better in 2009 than, say, Brad Haddin? That's unlikely, both for batting and keeping. Gilly's career path is on the way down, while Braddin's is on the way up. Have those career trajectories crossed yet? I suggest they have. They certainly will have by 2009.
There is nothing worse - apart from lots of other bad things in the world: drought, flood, bushfire, Silverchair - than sports people hanging on too long. Does Gilly want to hang on too long? Will the selectors allow him to hang on too long? He has a few credits in the bank, although he cashed a few in yesterday, but not that many that the selectors can afford to have him clogging up the chain of succession. At some point soon they will have to make the big call: "Mate, we need to have a chat."
Unless Gilly the famous walker, walks.
The papers have caught up. Jonny Pierik in the Hun:
Healy warns Gilchrist pressure is building from state level
WICKETKEEPING legend Ian Healy yesterday warned Adam Gilchrist he must retain his high standards or his glittering career could soon be over.
Gilchrist's future has become a major issue after his stunning blunder on day one of the fourth Test against India in Adelaide when the champion gloveman grassed an easy catch that should have dismissed V. V. S. Laxman.
Alex Brown in the Age:
A record haul but butter gloves put heat back on Gilchrist
ON THE day he broke the world record for Test dismissals, Adam Gilchrist found himself under immense pressure to defend his place in the team following a difficult series with the gloves and a strong challenge from long-time understudy Brad Haddin.
Just before accepting a catch from Anil Kumble to close the Indian innings â his 414th dismissal in Test cricket, passing South African gloveman Mark Boucher â Gilchrist's predecessor Ian Healy told Channel Nine that Australia's incumbent keeper was racing the clock to improve his game.
CASUALTIES OF LORE #
Richard Hinds in today's Fairfax (thanks, Amanda) puts a sensible perspective on the Sydney hysterics, but leaves no doubt as to who are the main hystericalists:
Of all the changes that have taken place during my time away (a period in which the editor tells me this spot was occupied by "some decent journalism for a change") the most unexpected was the sudden division of Australian sports fan into two distinct categories.
There are, on one side of the great divide, those bellowing ultra-nationalists draped in their Cronulla capes who say the only thing wrong with the behaviour of the Australian cricket team in the Sydney Test was that Brett Lee didn't give the Indians a bit more chin music.
On the other are the guardians of the Spirit of The Game or, disregarding more than a century of abuse, cheating and bloody confrontation, what they imagine that spirit to be. Those who cringe at the sight of the baggy green and spend their spare time kneeling apologetically outside the Indian Embassy begging for forgiveness.
If you choose your cultural stereotypes from the opinion columns or the letters page, there are no longer shades of grey in the grandstand. Just black and white. Which comes as a bit of a surprise to those of us who regularly watch sport with passionate, knowledgeable and (in the pre-Howard sense of the word) are patriotic Australians who fall into neither camp.
People who have risen to their feet to applaud Sachin Tendulkar at every venue this summer.
People who harbour suspicions that the sacking of umpire Steve Bucknor after extreme pressure from the Indians will influence subsequent decision-making. Not because they are irrational, flag-waving fools who would never acknowledge that Australia got the best of it in Sydney. But because they have hands-on experience in how the political process works.
People who shake their heads when the occasionally abusive and recalcitrant Harbhajan Singh is described as an "intemperate Sikh warrior" when some equally abusive and recalcitrant Australians are cast as low-lifes and cheats. Not out of some reflex jingoism, but because it is just so blindingly obvious to them that there are hot-heads and clowns in every team.
People who just laugh when Adam Gilchrist, a man who has done more than his fair share to resurrect the image of the Australian team, is accused of cheating because he appealed for a catch, which he was supposedly well placed to see, that came from Rahul Dravid's pad. No better placed, they'll say, than Anil Kumble was to see Andrew Symonds nick the ball on to his pad in Perth before the Indian skipper launched the heartiest of appeals.
They cringed when the Herald's esteemed columnist Peter Roebuck wrote this week - facetiously, you pray - that immigrants should be the only ones allowed to vote because they love their adopted country more. No doubt his mail bag is overflowing with bile from the Oi, Oi, Oi crowd after he declared the Australian captaincy vacant. But, even in jest, that suggestion was offensive to the very many reasonable Australian fans.
And, as rapidly as things change, those fans are still not as hard to find as recent debate suggests.
DAY THREE #
What do you say about a day in which Straya scored 3/250? Graft? Ok then: day three was a day of graft.
You are probably wondering why Straya didn't graft it last week. Well, we've covered that. Straya strolled out to bat last week in Perth and all of a sudden the WACA nut case, sorry, the WACA pitch started playing tricks and the bowlers started zinging the ball around all over the place. In short: the Aussie batsmen were bushwhacked. However, once they realized what was going on, they got their collective heads and arses at the recommended elevations for due diligence and ground out a pretty reasonable score in their second innings.
The same approach seems to have carried forward to Adelaide. (Carried forward? I hope that doesn't sound too nu-business.) The ball isn't moving around as much in the air as in Perth, but ever since V-Slog's first over before lunch there's been enough spite evident in the SACA tracka to encourage the Aussie batsmen to go the graft, rather than go the doctor.
The three batsmen out yesterday were bowled. I wonder how often in the history of Tests all batsmen out on one day were bowled. There was probably one day when there was one wicket which was bowled, but... but this is a pretty stupid reach for stats. Anyhoo, only one of the bowleds was down to the track, and even that dismissal required the assistance of a dumb shot. The other two bowleds came courtesy of superb reverse swingers.
Whatever the situation, though, you'd hope the Aussie batsmen keep on grafting on. There is a long way to go before Straya are anywhere near in a satisfactory position. Quick wickets this morning are a possibility against India's good bowlers and sensible fields which indicate India are once again playing to Straya's hubris, so here's hoping the Aussie batsmen don't do anything stupid. For the anatomically inclined: heads down, arses up, noses to the grindstone, backs into it, minds on the job.
That said, the great man Gilly will do whatever the great man Gilly feels like doing. A rapid hundred, chock full of sixes would be a fitting farewell, but he's just as likely to go out there and get bowled through the gate for a teary-eyed duck. Be interesting to see if Spanky leads a three-cheers from the commentary box as Gilly comes to the wicket. Quite a gig being an opinionista. Imagine having to call a bloke cheat one week and a champion the next. I mean, you can look like a tool, can't you.
GOAD WARRIOR #
With the aforementioned hubris in mind and its implication that India have been successful in goading Straya into stupid cricket, you would be right in assuming that this article snagged my attention:
Sehwag and Hayden trade verbal blows
A day of attrition was followed by a round of verbal volleys with both camps criticising the other for not pushing for victory. While Virender Sehwag criticised Australia for their defensive approach Matthew Hayden felt India's bowlers had been too negative with their lines. Sehwag said Australia were "scared of defeat" but Hayden countered that by referring to "India's wide tactics".
"They're not going to win, they're scared," Sehwag said on a day when Australia managed 260 runs for the loss of three wickets. "They are playing so defensively. They just got 260 in a day on a flat track; that's not like Australia. Last time they scored more than 400 in a day at Adelaide. I think they're scared of defeat."
Were India surprised by Australia's approach? "Yes, it was a surprise," he said without hesitation. "There is something wrong in their batting line-up or thinking. It didn't matter whether we set a field for attacking or defensive cricket, they were not playing too many shots. It was very frustrating with the wicket being so flat. We were waiting for the bad shot."
Good to see a bit of colour and movement on the sledging side. Ponting and Parolerboy were at it again yesterday, too. It just wouldn't be right if Straya and the Injuns weren't getting stuck into it.
But! As Spotty Cake Pat mentioned yesterday: "Australia do not have to win this Test."
If V-Slog sucks Straya into going the tonk, I'll chuck a fit.
DAY FOUR #
What is it with the Channel Nine commentators? They are experienced cricket people. They know the difference between a leg bye and The Long Goodbye. As players and captains they were successful, some famously so. Yet their prognostications yesterday bordered on madness.
Heals was adamant Straya should declare on or about India's score. Heals, Mr Tubbs and Slatts recited "it's time to up the run rate" as if they had speech impediments. The whole commentary team fixed on this or that declaration target. The overall tone was one of great urgency; that Straya were racing against some imaginary clock to post India with a target from which to mount a last day charge.
FFS, why? Why was Straya under any obligation whatsoever to do anything other than bat for as long as they could, thus putting India out of the match? Australia don't have to win this match. India do. And the longer Straya batted the less chance there was of India doing that do. Big deal if Straya batted into Monday, steadily building a daunting lead. The further they went ahead, the more likely it was that India would have just one option: defend for a draw, like they DIDN'T do in Sydney.
Still, the stupid commentary wouldn't have bothered me too much if it didn't look as if their corrosive fumes hadn't somehow permeated the Strayan dressing room. Sure, Gilly might have tooled out, smacked a rapid 50 or 100 and we'd be away. But he didn't. In fact, Gilly's batting, like Roy's, Johnston's and Clarke's (I didn't see Lee get out) was cavalier. You'd have thought Roy in particular would have taken the hint to pull his head in after numerous accidents trying to cut too close to his body. Johnston tried to clear Instant at long on. Clark tried to clear mid-wicket. Maybe they were just sick of batting, but they didn't need to go about it the way they did in the hour after tea. Yes, the bowling was good and most of the remaining batsmen were tailenders...
Almost every other tail-ender in the world has his ears so clogged up with testosterone that they ignore the batman-at-the-other-end's supplications for sensible shot selection.
"Look," says Recognised Batsman, "I'm on 94; can you just defend this next over for a bit, mate?"
What the tail-ender hears:
"Lash 'em around the park. You the man! You the man! HONK! HOOONK!"
... but they were taking a cue. If Ponting had said to play it steady, they might just have, you know, played it steady. Instead, what we got was a dopy blend of hit and mis-hit as Straya chased unnecessary quick runs.
And where are we now? India in with a chance, that's where. Not a huge chance, but still a chance. That's more than they would have had if Straya hadn't, for the sake of this explanation, got sick of batting.
Now the destiny of the game is in India's hands. Again: they have to win. So there's every chance they will go out there tomorrow, knock up a lead of around 200, declare and stick Straya in on a day five Adelaide wicket. Or they might get all out with a lead of 200. Either way it amounts to the same thing: India setting a day five target. A target that Straya will be obliged to chase hard after, perhaps recklessly, because "they are doing it for Gilly".
How many of you lot want to see Straya bat in those circs? How many of you want to see Straya bat at all? Some commentators even had the bare-faced to give it the "today is the last time you will ever see Gilly bat" treatment.
Then, just to garnish this sh1t sandwich, Clarke goes and drops another sitter. I couldn‘t believe it. Did he even get his hands to it? Did he bother to watch his own dismissal as sticky-fingers Laxman comfortably snagged a difficult wide one. If I hear another commentator blab on about how "Straya set incredibly high benchmarks for fielding" I'll be forced to pen a menacing letter.
Thing is, the commentators are not imbos. They are worse. They are intentionally selling us a lemon. It's in their interest to have Straya make a game of it, not have them play India out of the match and cruise to a draw, or possibly an Aussie win. They would like nothing more than for India to make a game of it on day five.
Tony could then sell another picture, $500 unframed: Sydney Reversed!
ROLL PLAYER #
At the Straya v. India Test in Adelaide in 2003, the SACA booked Greg Mahatma Coat Ritchie to provide light entertainment. Do you think they've still got the same booking agent?
Charges for monkey-mask pitch invader
A SPECTATOR wearing a monkey mask is facing charges after sprinting on to the Adelaide Oval during Andrew Symonds' innings yesterday.
His intrusion on to the playing surface temporarily halted play and came moments before Symonds was dismissed.
"This is a police matter," said Cricket Australia's anti-racism officer Peter Young. "Trespassing is a serious issue. No one wants a repeat of the (Terry) Alderman situation where a player ended up hurt."
The intruder ran between India's fieldsmen and rolled across the turf before being restrained by security personnel.
DAY FIVE #
What goes around runs aground.
V-Slog might care to prostrate himself before the time-honoured excuse: "I was taken out of context."
"I think they're scared of defeat."
Who wasn't absolutely certain that India would declare around tea around 200 in front and then hope Straya would self-implode "doing it for Gilly" as they chased an ambitious target?
Certainly it never crossed anyone's mind that India would toss the chance of drawing the series 2-2 and would bat out the whole day before Kumble meekly conceded "We'll call it a draw." Yet when I came in to check the television about an hour after Tea, firmly expecting to see Straya at the crease, I was astonished to see that it precisely what happened.
Even Bruce, who was closest to the pin, wouldn't have thought India would bat on and on and on and on and... who is the wuss now Sloggy?
Then there were fatheads ringing up radio stations - I know, I know - and making the odd comment around the blogs that India's conservative batting on day five should somehow be equated with Straya's conservative batting on days three and four. There was even one honker rung up SEN suggesting that the reason Gilly suddenly retired was because he had had an argument with Ponting over the way Straya batted.
That's not to suggest the day's cricket was entirely dull. Things were livened up substantially by a brilliant exchange on BJ & The Boys when AB asked Ravi Shastri about Rollerboy's upcoming appeal hearing. Ravi stepped towards the camera, looking as if he was going to punch someone as he went ballistic nationalistic about the pride of being an Indian and how they have a long history of fighting racism, but didn't come close to mentioning Rollerboy or any details directly relevant to the case. I can't recall exactly how AB closed off the topic but it was somewhere in the vicinity of "ummm, yeah" while Flemmo backed away squeezing out a slightly scared giggle. Gold.
Speaking of the appeal: how do you think it will go? My earlier suspicions were confirmed when it emerged from the hearing documents that Tendulkar hadn't heard the exchange. What's the bet the reason India don't want the stump mike recordings presented as evidence is that if the stump mike didn't hear anything, then Tendulkar couldn't have heard anything either.
Still, you should never get between Big Cricket and a squibb. Rollerboy will either get off, have his penalty reduced to a reprimand or accept a charge that is altered to general abuse.
SPIN SHITTY #
The ballyhoo this week is rightfully all about Gilly. No problem with that; it’s a deserved ballyhoo. But what the Gilly rumpus has done is slightly, although not completely, obscure another more pressing issue for Aussie croquet: spin.
Sehwag exposes Australia's spin crisis
VIRENDER SEHWAG has saved India and his career with a century in Adelaide yesterday that raised serious questions about Australia's spin bowling and catching.
Gilly has been a lesser force for around three years now. It’s no great disaster that he’s no longer there to get Straya out of the sh1t or apply the gracey coup to a flagging attack. Now Braddin is playing better cricket than Now Gilly, so the keeper swap is not going to unduly hurt Now Straya.
Not so the spin department.
Warne’s loss is still the greatest problem for Straya and nowhere is it more obvious than in a comparison between this Adelaide and last Adelaide. Straya won against England in 2006 because Warne imposed himself on the contest. The match should have been a draw. This time around we lacked Warne the Enforcer. Not that he would have been able to push India around the way he pushed England around. The Poms squibbed it. A couple of quick wickets and they were in Shark G.W. territory. This India would not have choked like that England choked.
Warne’s ability to crowbar a wicket on the dullest pitch is the greatest reason we will miss him. Not one of our spinners since has looked even remotely like scaring enough batsmen to collapse an attack. Stuey MacGill was rubbish against the Shrees and Hogg, Symonds and Clarke were innocuous to passable against India.
Hogg has probably played his last Test, which is disappointing because I like him. While Clarke and Symonds will have to do bit part duty until “something turns up,” as Micawber would optimistically say.
But it’s Roy that worries me most. His action, as always when an offy is looking for extra tweak, is diabolical. The same goes for all the suss offies: Murali, Harby, the rest of the malefactors. Doubtless they will defend it by saying they were within the 15 degree limit, but I’d give it very short odds that more than a few of their offies were over 15 degrees. It’s why the new rule is a joke. How can anyone say with any official conviction – whether they be umpires, TV people, match refs, ICC overlords, whoever – that a bowler is chucking. “Was that 14? 13? 25?” But if the rule were back to what it was in the G.O. Days, you could tell straight away that a bowler was on the nose.
Everyone’s pretty much in agreemen… sorry, this is a sports piece. Everyone’s pretty much in agreeance that Murali was lame last November and since Christmas Harby has fired blanks at everyone but Ponting. Could this be because they were strongly conscious of the attention paid to dodgy actions in Straya and as such weren’t capable of extracting dangerous turn with pronounced elbow action? Does playing in Straya neuter them? I mean, Channel Nine might heavily tailor their slo-mo footage so as to mask chucking, but in normal motion it’s still pretty obvious when someone is bending the rules. Nine can’t edit their ball-by-ball footage like they can the slo stuff, so we viewers get a good look at what’s what. And while Murali and Rollerboy were less than effective, is it not a coincidence that Roy, who hasn’t yet been called, decided to push his luck with his own pronounced bend and was an effective bowler?
Doubtless The Cooler has had Roy in his workshop tuning Roy’s arm to get just the right amount of bend. And maybe he hasn’t exceeded the 15 degrees. Maybe. I doubt it.
New Chucking is a rort.
TIRED AND DEMOTIONAL #
Be f**ked! Larry Tait is exhausted and has dropped himself from... well, all cricket:
Shaun Tait quits cricket indefinitely
Australian fast bowler Shaun Tait has quit cricket indefinitely, citing emotional and physical exhaustion.
PROTEST MATCH SPECIAL #
So Rollerboy’s protest was successful; there’s a shock.
“I honestly believe Harbhajan said an obscenity, not racial abuse.”
~~ Dean Jones
“The noble Deano.” Quite obviously Deano is not looking to protect any commentary gigs on the subcontinent. Nor is he sucking up after his terrorist episode. “For Deano is an honourable man.”
The next step in the process is clear: Harbhajan should immediately instigate proceedings against Ponting, Symonds, Hayden and Clarke for their false accusations of racism.
No?
Yeah. No.
You know who is the real culprit here? The ICC.
Well, Mandy Rice TonyT, you would say that, wouldn’t you?
Yes, I would. Not because Big Cricket* squibbed it over the appeal. Not because Big Cricket squibbed it over Morgan getting sacked. Not because Big Cricket squibbed it full stop. Big Cricket is the culprit because their judiciary process was a cock-up from the off. Mike Proctor knew it and approached Mal Speed to say he didn’t have the legal expertise to deal with the case. Pity Mal didn’t take the hint. Instead he told Proctor to get stuffed and get on with the case and the rest, as they say, is bollox.
<
