Going by orthodox wisdom Australia are gawn. Haven't won in ages, injuries galore, bowlers couldn't hit the front of a sightscreen, can't defend, fielding is sloppy, Yarprica on a roll, Engerland full of confidence, Un Zud hooped on cock. It all adds up to a combination of crisis, panic stations, disarray, trouble AND strife.
To listen to the pundits' flack you'd think Australia had lost each match by an innings. Geese. Australia have merely refused to show their hand through a tedious series of slightly strenuous practice matches in which key players have been rested and possibles trialled, thus lulling their too-quick-to-gloat adversaries into a lethal trap. Come in spinners.
Did no one see the smiles on the Aussie faces as the Kiwis went the tonk in the Chadlee? Sure, they would have liked to win, who doesn't. But did they really care? Is the Pope a German. I mean, who can take Craig McMillan seriously when it matters? Those were the cheery - and not even slightly embarrassed - smiles of sportsmen quietly confident their plans were about to bear fruition.
It will be satisfying indeed when Sorth Efrica shit themselves in the semi final; NZ have their usual overexpectations deflated by an outsider; and England fail to get out of the group stage, dudded by too many reverse sweeps.
A poll: What is your favourite sucker punch?
a) Paullus & Varro pumped at Cannae
b) Crassus crushed at Carrhae
c) Boss Hogg duped by the Dukes at Hazzard County
d) Cricket dopes roped by Aussies at Windia
I take it no one agrees.
You are swine.
Posted by: Tony.T | 21 February 2007 at 14:45
Third man and Fine leg inside the circle may have to be rethought.
Do I have to choose just one? History will be the judge of d)
Posted by: Bruce | 21 February 2007 at 14:59
Dean Jones.
Posted by: SaggyGreen | 21 February 2007 at 15:20
Sorry, that's my default answer when I don't understand the question. Works a charm in pubtrivia. Although, I did just have a flashback to Rosco P. Coletrane.
Posted by: SaggyGreen | 21 February 2007 at 15:26
Speaking of matters Roman, are you watching Rome series 2?
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | 21 February 2007 at 15:34
Obviously, the loss of Australia's number 1 ranked player, Warnie, before the 03 World Cup was such a screaming success that Buckman is emulating it for 07.
Posted by: nick | 21 February 2007 at 16:07
Back to reality though. Favourite sucker punch? Bickley vs Wakelin in Showdown 12.
Posted by: nick | 21 February 2007 at 16:10
Just hope R.T Ponting is not like a certain M.L Crassus, just for Australia's sake.
Although a nice drink of pure molten gold never hurt anyone.
Posted by: Adsy | 21 February 2007 at 16:22
Hasn't Martin Johnson heard the old adage? "He who gloats last gloats gloatiest."
Posted by: Tony.T | 21 February 2007 at 17:05
My favourite sucker punch was 1983 when J.M.Fraser, thinking he would easily beat Bill Hayden, called an election on the same day that Labor dumped Hayden and called Hawkie to the bat.
Of course, having said that, I would prefer anyday, to be a friend of JMF than a friend of RJH. Mal just had incompetent advisors.
Posted by: brownie | 21 February 2007 at 17:51
If you are a friend of RJLH, Brownie, you get to bask in the aura of his suntan.
Posted by: Tony.T | 21 February 2007 at 18:29
As someone who actually fought at Cannae I would have to nominate Varro. What a tool. We reverse spun the cavalry, played a straight bat with the infantry and used the Gauls during the powerplay.
50,000 Roman dead, a field soaked in blood and Bill Lawry on commentary. Great days.
Tone, disregard old Jonners of the Telegraph - he's a fat twat with a disreputable beard. Simon Barnes is the man.
Posted by: woody | 21 February 2007 at 19:41
As a person who has never voted Labor in his life (only Libs and Nats), I can say without question, that RJLH pisses all over JMF. JMF is the worst Prime Minister in this country's history.
But what about EGW, I hear you say! Everyone knew what they were going to get with EGW, and if they didn't, they were stupid. The Australian electorate voted for JMF, because they wanted him to roll back EGW's legacy. He didn't and we're still going today.
Posted by: murph | 21 February 2007 at 20:24
Now. Back to normal programming.
If I had to put my house on it: Australia all the way.
Posted by: murph | 21 February 2007 at 20:26
Marc Anthony & Octavian vs Brutus & Cassius
Posted by: James Dudek | 22 February 2007 at 01:37
Crassus wasn't the first Roman to imbibe in hot drinks either. Manius Aquillus imbibed about 20 years beforehand.
Posted by: Scott Wickstein | 22 February 2007 at 03:51
James: I thought of including Philippi, but felt, on balance, that would have upset the delicate balance of my joke vis-a-vis the Dukes o' Hazzard. You'll agree, no doubt.
Posted by: Tony.T | 22 February 2007 at 14:37
If you go by Malcolm Conn, we're gawn.
Posted by: Tony.T | 22 February 2007 at 14:48
I prefer Buchanan's assessment. At least, I want to prefer it:
Posted by: Tony.T | 22 February 2007 at 14:51
The location of the holes is rather self-evident.
Filling said holes is the bit that has me a bit worried. I don't see anything so far to make me think there are the patches and rubber cement required to fix the balloon.
Posted by: Bruce | 22 February 2007 at 15:33
We could try an old vulcanizing kit, although I was never able to make one work properly.
Even things up by giving the batsmen polyarmoured bats.
Better still - terryarmoured bats.
Posted by: Tony.T | 22 February 2007 at 15:35
I for one will not be panicking until we lose the WC, true enough our side wot fronted the sheep-enjoyers got walloped into history but I reckon bringing back Punter will make all the difference. Shameless is a fine batsman but too nice a bloke to be captain I reckon, he just doesn't have that "cunt" streak in him.
Oh, and for anyone who mentioned Punter being a shit captain in the past, please go and top yourselves now thanks - a 77% success rate can't be too far wrong.
Posted by: Vindicate | 23 February 2007 at 02:26
Your lot are still a great side, but we are enjoying your current lack of form.
Posted by: Yorkshire Soul | 23 February 2007 at 05:54
V: I, for one, still maintain failing to defend 300+ four times is an aberation. On the surface the results would suggest we're absolutely dreadful. I just don't, CANNOT!, buy that.
Y: Dunno about great side. We're just not as awful as recent results indicate. And you're not enjoying our current lack of form half as much as I'm not.
Posted by: Tony.T | 23 February 2007 at 13:44
Tony, it is worth remembering that in order to fail to defend 300+ four times, a team must score 300+ four times.
Mostly though, the approach is all wrong. We get early wickets then bowl our part-timers against new batsmen with a spread field, letting them settle, letting the innings flow. It's complete bullshit.
There is no point anymore in saving bowlers for the end. Teams don't bat like that. They attack early and often, to finish the game as early as possible. The quicks get smacked around just as easily at the death - if not more so. Captains should be bowling their best out by the 40th over, keep the field up to take wickets, and then hope they've done enough.
And Australia needs to field better.
Posted by: Russ | 23 February 2007 at 22:48
I'm putting a tenner on Sorth Efrica Tone. I don't want 'em to win, but I've got a nagging suspicion they've come good at the right time.
Posted by: Steve | 03 March 2007 at 13:40
I agree, Steve, as much as it pains me to say it.
Sure, Australia are arrogant in the way they go about the caper, but at least we are arrogant as winners. Under Smuthy, Sorth Efrica are arrogant even when they are losing.
It won't be easy watching him lift the trophy. Here's hoping for another semi-final choke.
Posted by: Tony.T | 03 March 2007 at 14:52
Wien ist mir im moment zu distanziert... Dann will ich dir wenigstens auf diesem wege meine lieben grube zukommen lassen!!! :)
Posted by: Thomas | 21 June 2007 at 07:39
"Vienna is too far away for me at the moment"??
"But at least I want you to come back to my dear pit"??
My dear dear pit? You're not Welsh, are you?
By the way, I took out all the links and your email address.
Posted by: Tony T. | 21 June 2007 at 15:40
Posted by: Cox | 04 July 2007 at 21:04
Shut up, Coxy.
Posted by: Tony.T | 04 July 2007 at 23:48